DECEMBER 2019
|
PHYSICS TODAY 71
above and below the fluid surface have
been established by the density contrast,
it will float stably in any orientation. But
a cubic body has well-defined stable ori-
entations relative to the fluid surface that
over a wide range of densities do not in-
clude the intuitive orientations—floating
with a face or edge parallel to the fluid
surface or with a corner pointing upward,
perpendicular to the surface. To test that
assertion experimentally, just place a cube
of wood in water and let it stabilize.
How will an iceberg shaped like the
one shown in figure 1 establish a stable
equilibrium orientation? A geometry
useful for examining stability quantita-
tively is the circular cylinder of length H
and diameter D, as shown in figure 2.
When H < D, the cylinder is a disk, and
when H > D, the cylinder is elongated,
like a wine cork or pencil. The question
raised by figure 1 is whether cylindrical
bodies of ice whose lengths exceed their
diameters float with their long axes per-
pendicular to the water surface? The an-
swer is generally no, particularly for
elongated cylinders with H > 2D.
The shape of stability
In 2004 D. S. Dugdale presented a useful
discussion of the floating-cylinder prob-
lem. He defined four domains of stable
equilibrium in density–shape space: (I) The
cylinder floats with its rotational axis perpendicular to the
water surface and its circular faces parallel to the water surface.
(II) The cylinder floats with its rotational axis parallel to the
water surface and its circular faces partially submerged to a
depth dependent on the density of the cylinder. (III) The rota-
tional axis of the cylinder is tilted at an angle neither parallel
nor perpendicular to the surface. (IV) The orientations de-
scribed in I and II are both stable.
Figure 2 illustrates the complexity of those domains of sta-
ble equilibrium as a function of density contrast and cylinder
shape. For ice floating in water (ρ = 0.9), stable equilibria exist
only under the conditions of domains I, II and IV; the density
conditions that yield stable equilibria within domain III (that
is, in the range 0.2 < ρ < 0.8) exclude the ice–water density con-
trast. Therefore, ice cylinders floating in water will stabilize in
only two orientations—with the cylindrical axis either perpen-
dicular or parallel to the water surface.
In 1991 Edgar Gilbert showed that for a stable equilibrium
with the cylindrical axis perpendicular to the water surface, the
following condition must hold: ρ(1 − ρ)(2H/D)
2
< 0.5. For ρ =
0.9, the equation requires that H/D < 1.1785. A glance at the ice-
berg in figure 1 leaves li"le doubt that its H/D ratio is greater
than that. So the iceberg violates the stability condition re-
quired for the cylinder to float with its rotational axis perpen-
dicular to the water surface. It would therefore spontaneously
reposition itself to an orientation with its rotational axis hori-
zontal. In that equilibrium orientation, the waterline on the
cylinder is a rectangle of length H and width w.
The width is determined by the density difference between
the floating body and the fluid—that is, by how much of the
cylinder is submerged. Gilbert showed that the equilibrium is
stable if w < H. For ρ > 0.5, w < D, and all cylinders where H/D >
1, the condition for stability is met because w < D < H. The actual
stability field, as determined from the condition w < H, is H/D >
0.7266, as shown in figure 2. Therefore, along the dashed line ρ
= 0.9 and in the range 0.7266 < H/D < 1.1785, both cylinder ori-
entations are stable and can coexist. For H/D > 1.1785, certainly
the case for the iceberg in figure 1, the equilibrium orientation is
intrinsically unstable and does not occur in nature.
Additional resources
‣ D. S. Dugdale, “Stability of a floating cylinder,” Int. J. Eng.
Sci. 42, 691 (2004).
‣ E. N. Gilbert, “How things float,” Amer. Math. Monthly 98,
201 (1991).
‣ J. F. Nye, J. R. Po"er, “The use of catastrophe theory to
analyse the stability and toppling of icebergs,” Ann. Glaciol. 1,
49 (1980).
‣ J. C. Burton et al., “Laboratory investigations of iceberg cap-
size dynamics, energy dissipations and tsunamigenesis,”
J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 117, F01007 (2012).
PT