96
GEORGE
A.
MILLER
gists,
linguists,
and
anthropologists
and
yet, probably because
receding
is
less
accessible
to
experimental manipulation
than
nonsense
syllables
or T
mazes,
the
traditional
experimental
psychologist
has
contributed
little
or
nothing
to
their
analysis. Nevertheless, experimental
techniques
can be
used, methods
of re-
coding
can be
specified,
behavioral
in-
dicants
can be
found.
And I
anticipate
that
we
will
find a
very orderly
set of
relations describing what
now
seems
an
uncharted wilderness
of
individual dif-
ferences.
Third,
the
concepts
and
measures
provided
by the
theory
of
information
provide
a
quantitative
way of
getting
at
some
of
these
questions.
The
theory
provides
us
with
a
yardstick
for
cali-
brating
our
stimulus materials
and for
measuring
the
performance
of our
sub-
jects.
In the
interests
of
communica-
tion
I
have suppressed
the
technical
de-
tails
of
information measurement
and
have tried
to
express
the
ideas
in
more
familiar
terms;
I
hope
this
paraphrase
will
not
lead
you to
think they
are not
useful
in
research. Informational con-
cepts have already proved valuable
in
the
study
of
discrimination
and of
lan-
guage; they promise
a
great deal
in the
study
of
learning
and
memory;
and it
has
even been proposed that they
can
be
useful
in the
study
of
concept for-
mation.
A lot of
questions that seemed
fruitless
twenty
or
thirty years
ago may
now
be
worth another look.
In
fact,
I
feel
that
my
story
here must
stop
just
as it
begins
to get
really
interesting.
And
finally,
what about
the
magical
number
seven? What about
the
seven
wonders
of the
world,
the
seven
seas,
the
seven
deadly
sins,
the
seven daugh-
ters
of
Atlas
in the
Pleiades,
the
seven
ages
of
man,
the
seven levels
of
hell,
the
seven primary colors,
the
seven notes
of
the
musical
scale,
and the
seven
days
of
the
week? What about
the
seven-
point rating scale,
the
seven categories
for
absolute
judgment,
the
seven
ob-
jects
in the
span
of
attention,
and the
seven
digits
in the
span
of
immediate
memory?
For the
present
I
propose
to
withhold judgment.
Perhaps
there
is
something
deep
and
profound
behind
all
these
sevens, something just calling
out
for
us to
discover
it. But I
suspect
that
it is
only
a
pernicious,
Pythagorean
coincidence.
REFERENCES
1.
BEEBE-CENTER,
J. G.,
ROGERS,
M. S., &
O'CoNNELL,
B.
N.
Transmission
of in-
formation
about
sucrose
and
saline solu-
tions
through
the
sense
of
taste.
J.
Psychol.,
19SS,
39,
157-160.
2.
BOUSFIELD,
W.
A.,
&
COHEN,
B. H. The
occurrence
of
clustering
in the
recall
of
randomly
arranged
words
of
different
frequencies-of-usage.
/.
gen.
Psychol.,
1955,
52,
83-9S.
3.
CARMICHAEL,
L.,
HOGAN,
H. P., &
WALTER,
A. A. An
experimental study
of the
effect
of
language
on the
reproduction
of
visually
perceived
form.
/.
exp.
Psychol.,
1932,
IS,
73-86.
4.
CHAPMAN,
D. W.
Relative
effects
of de-
terminate
and
indeterminate
Aufgaben.
Amer.
J.
Psychol, 1932,
44,
163-174.
5.
ERIKSEN,
C. W.
Multidimensional stimu-
lus
differences
and
accuracy
of
discrimi-
nation.
VSAF,
WADC
Tech.
Rep.,
1954,
No.
54-165.
6.
ERIKSEN,
C.
W.,
&
HAKE,
H. W.
Abso-
lute
judgments
as a
function
of the
stimulus
range
and the
number
of
stimulus
and
response categories.
/.
exp.
Psychol.,
1955,
49,
323-332.
7.
GARNER,
W. R. An
informational
analy-
sis of
absolute judgments
of
loudness.
/.
exp.
Psychol.,
1953,
46,
373-380.
8.
HAKE,
H.
W.,
&
GARNER,
W. R. The ef-
fect
of
presenting various numbers
of
discrete
steps
on
scale
reading
accuracy,
/.
exp.
Psychol.,
1951,
42,
358-366.
9.
HALSEY,
R.
M.,
&
CHAPANIS,
A.
Chro-
maticity-confusion
contours
in a
com-
plex
viewing situation.
J.
Opt. Soc.
Amer.,
1954,
44,
442-4S4.
10.
HAYES,
J. R. M.
Memory span
for
sev-
eral vocabularies
as a
function
of vo-
cabulary
size.
In
Quarterly
Progress
Report,
Cambridge, Mass.: Acoustics
Laboratory, Massachusetts
Institute
of
Technology,
Jan.-June,
1952.