the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the
SFB project “BeyondC”, the projects I-2526-N27
and I-2906. This publication was made possible
through the support of a grant from the John
Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed
in this publication are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the John
Templeton Foundation.
References
[1] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki.
Separability of mixed states: necessary and suffi-
cient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223, 1–8 (1996).
[arXiv: quant-ph/9605038].
[2] G. M. D’Ariano, Martina de Laurentis, M. G. A.
Paris, A. Porzio, and S. Solimeno. Quantum
tomography as a tool for the characterization of
optical devices. Journal of Optics B: Quantum
and Semiclassical Optics 4, S127 (2002). [arXiv:
quant-ph/0110110].
[3] J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen para-
dox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).
[4] N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio,
V. Scarani, and Stephanie Wehner. Bell
nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419–478
(2014).
[5] M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and C. Fernan-
dez. Measurements incompatible in quantum the-
ory cannot be measured jointly in any other no-
signaling theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 230402
(2009). [arXiv: 0905.2998].
[6] D. Mayers and A. Yao. Self testing quantum ap-
paratus. Quantum Information and Computation
4, 273–286 (2004). [arXiv: quant-ph/0307205].
[7] C.-E. Bardyn, T. C. H. Liew, S. Massar, M. McK-
ague, and V. Scarani. Device-independent state
estimation based on bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev.
A 80, 062327 (2009). [arXiv: 0907.2170].
[8] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger. Experi-
mental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-
Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation
of Bell’s Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94
(1982).
[9] B. Hensen, et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality
violation using electron spins separated by 1.3
kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015). [arXiv:
1508.05949].
[10] Marissa Giustina, et al. Significant-loophole-free
test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015). [arXiv:
1511.03190].
[11] L. K. Shalm, et al. Strong loophole-free test
of local realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402
(2015). [arXiv: 1511.03189].
[12] A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Piro-
nio, and V. Scarani. Device-independent security
of quantum cryptography against collective at-
tacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007). [arXiv:
quant-ph/0702152].
[13] A. Acín, S. Massar, and S. Pironio. Randomness
versus nonlocality and entanglement. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 108, 100402 (2012). [arXiv: 1107.2754].
[14] H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C.
Doherty. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality,
and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys.
Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007). [arXiv: quant-
ph/0612147].
[15] M. T. Quintino, T. Vértesi, and N. Brun-
ner. Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-
Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 113, 160402 (2014). [arXiv: 1406.6976].
[16] R. Uola, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne. Joint
measurability of generalized measurements im-
plies classicality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160403
(2014). [arXiv: 1407.2224].
[17] C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Wal-
born, V. Scarani, and H. M. Wiseman. One-
sided device-independent quantum key distribu-
tion: Security, feasibility, and the connection
with steering. Phys. Rev. A 85, 010301 (2012).
[arXiv: 1109.1435].
[18] O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner.
Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nat.
Commun. 3, 1092 (2012). [arXiv: 1105.4464].
[19] G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti.
Transforming quantum operations: Quantum su-
permaps. Europhysics Letters 83, 30004 (2008).
[arXiv: 0804.0180].
[20] G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Peri-
notti. Theoretical framework for quantum net-
works. Phys. Rev. A 80, 022339 (2009). [arXiv:
0904.4483].
[21] M. Araújo, A. Feix, M. Navascués, and Č.
Brukner. A purification postulate for quantum
mechanics with indefinite causal order. Quantum
1, 10 (2017). [arXiv: 1611.08535].
[22] G. Chiribella. Perfect discrimination of no-
signalling channels via quantum superposition
of causal structures. Phys. Rev. A 86, 040301
(2012). [arXiv: 1109.5154].
[23] A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č. Brukner. Quantum
superposition of the order of parties as a com-
munication resource. Phys. Rev. A 92, 052326
(2015). [arXiv: 1508.07840].
[24] P. A. Guérin, A. Feix, M. Araújo, and Č.
Brukner. Exponential communication complex-
ity advantage from quantum superposition of
the direction of communication. Phys. Rev. Lett.
117, 100502 (2016). [arXiv: 1605.07372].
Accepted in Quantum 2019-07-07, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0. 15