Particles having energies above $10^{18}$ eV are the so-called ultr...
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), discovered in 1966 by A. Pen...
The main reactions causing energy losses while the CR propagation a...
We can easily determine the distance scale for energy loss given by...
As a simple exercise, one can calculate the threshold energy of pro...
Spectrum of UHECR as observed by HiRes, TA and Auger experiments (a...
Today the upper limit on the energy of Cosmic Rays is called **Grei...
VOLUME
16,
NUMBER
17
PHYSICAL
REVIEW
LETTERS
25
APRiL
1966
tons.
When
the
complete
potential
is
deformed,
the
optical
parameters(Table
I)
found
so
far
to
give
thebest
fit
tothe
elastic
polarization
also
produce
thebest
prediction
ofinelastic
asymmetry.
All
the
curvesin
Fig.
2
use
a
central-well
deformation
parameter
of
P,
=0.
39for
~si
and
P,
=
0.
22
for
~Ni.
Thedeformation
parameter
ofthespin-orbitterm
is
1.
5
timesthe
central-
well
value,
which
produces
slightly
better
agree-
mentwiththe
asymmetry
data
for
"Si.
Both
realand
imaginary
parts
of
the
spin-orbit
in-
teractionare
included,
butsince
i
W~I
«VS,
the
imaginarypart
makes
littledifference.
The
curves
alsoincludeCoulomb-excitation
amplitudes,
'
whichmakelittle
differencein
eitherthe
asymmetry
or
thecrosssection.
We
findthatfor
all
ofthe
calculations
made,
thepredictions
ofinelastic
asymmetry
and
inelastic
polarizationare
very
nearly
identi-
cal.
In
summary
we
find
that,
provided
the
imag-
inary
and
spin-orbitterms
areincluded,
the
collective-model
generalization
ofthe
optical
potential
gives
a
good
accountofthe
present
inelastic
asymmetry
dataatallbut
the
most
forward
angles.
It
is
quite
possible
that
a
more
comprehensive
treatmentof
the
spin-de-
pendent
interactionwill
improve
mattersin
this
region,
and
such
calculationsarein
pro-
gress.
It
isa
pleasureto
acknowledge
many
useful
conversationsconcerning
thisworkwithG.R.
SatchlerandN.
M.
Hi.ntz.We
aremuchindebted
to
the
indefatigable
ORIC
cyclotron
operators,
and
to
M.B.
Marshall,
W.
H.
White,
I.
B.
Schneider,
andA.W.
Riikolaofthe
ORIC
staff,
fortheir
essential
contributionstothe
experi-
mental
effort.
*Research
sponsored
by
the
U.S.Atomic
Energy
Com-
mission
under
contract
with
theUnionCarbideCorpora-
tion.
)OakRidge
Graduate
Fellow
from
the
University
of
Minnesotaunder
appointment
from
Oak
Ridge
Asso-
ciated
Universities.
f.
Graduate
Fellowfromthe
University
ofTennessee
under
appointment
from
theNationalScience
Founda-
tion.
~R.
H.
Bassel,G.R.Satchler,R.M.Drisko,
and
E.
Rost,Phys.
Rev.
128,
2693
(1962).
The
present
DW
calculationsincludethespin-orbit
terminthe
elag+ic
distortion.
M.
P.Frickeand
G.
R.Satchler,
Phys.
Rev.
139,
B567
(1965).
3T.
Stovall
and
N.M.
Hintz,
Phys.
Rev.
135,
B330
(1964).
See,
for
example,W.
S.
Gray,
R.
A.
Kenefick,
J.
J.
Kraushaar,
and
G.
R.
Satchler,
Phys.
Rev.
142,
735
(1966);
G.R.
Satchler,
to
be
published.
5E.
R.
Flynn
and
R.H.
Bassel,
Phys.
Rev.
Letters
15,
168
(1965),
and
other
references
given
there.
6L.
N.
Blumberg,
E.E.
Gross,A.
van
der
Woude,
and
A.
Zucker,
Nucl.Instr.
5
Methods
~39
125
(1966);
L.
N.
Blumberg,
E.E.
Gross,
A.van
der
Woude,
A.Zucker,
and
R.
H.Bassel,
to
be
published.
ENDTO
THE
COSMIC-RAY
SPECTRUM'~
KennethGreisen
Cornell
University,Ithaca,
NewYork
(Received
1
April
1966)
The
primary
cosmic-ray
spectrum
hasbeen
measured
up
to
an
energy
of
10'
eV,
'
and
sev-
eral
groups
have
described
projects
under
de-
velopment
orin
mind'
to
investigate
the
spec-
trum
further,
into
the
energy
range
10"-10"
eV.
Thisnote
predicts
thatabove
10'
eV
the
pri-
mary
spectrum
will
steepen
abruptly,
and
the
experiments
in
preparation
willat
last
observe
it
to
have
a
cosmologically
meaningful
termi.
-
nation.
Thecauseof
the
catastrophic
cutoffis
the
intense
isotropic
radiationfirst
detected
by
Penzias
and
Wilson'
at
4080
Mc/sec
(7.
35
cm)
and
now
confirmedas
thermalin
character
by
measurementsof
Rolland
Wilkinson4
at
3.
2
cmwavelength.
Itisnot
essential
tothe
pres-
ent
argument
that
the
origin
ofthis
radiation
conform
exactly
tothe
primeval-fireball
mod-
el
outlined
by
Dicke,
Peebles,
Roll,
and
Vfil-
kinson',
what
matters
is
only
that
the
radia-
tion
existsand
pervades
the
observable
uni-
verse.
The
transparency
of
space
at
the
per-
tinent
wavelengths,
and
the
consistency
of
in-
tensity
observationsin
numerousdirections,
748
VOLUME
16,
NUMBER
17
PHYSICALREVIEWLETTERS
25
APRIL
1966
give
strong
assurance
thattheradiationis
in-
deeduniversal.
The
equivalentblack-body
temperaturehasbeen
reportedas
3.
1+
1'K'
and
3.
0+0.
5'K.
'
Forour
discussion,weshall
consider
T
=3.
0,
at
which
temperaturethe
photondensity
is548
cm
'
and
the
mean
pho-
ton
energy
7.
0x10
4
eV.
Although
at
this
tem-
perature
the
numberof
photons
in
the
spectral
range
ofthemeasurements
(A
=-
3.
2
cm)
is
only
5
&10
'
ofthe
total,
the
slope
of
the
spec-
trumissuch
that
any
reasonable
extrapola-
tionto
shorter
wavelengths
would
yield
atleast
a
substantial
part
of
the
3'
black-body
photon
density.Moreover,
two
indirect
confirma-
tionsoftheexistence
oftheradiation
havebeen
reported:
One
liesinthe
slope
ofthe
isotropic
part
of
the
x-
and
gamma-ray
spectrum'
and
the
otherinthe
absence
ofmuon-poorair
show-
ers
above
10"
eV.
'
Asthelast
statement
implies,
severa,l
con-
sequences
oftheexistence
ofthe
thermal
ra-
diation
have
quickly
been
noted.Oneistopro-
vide
a
source
of
x
rays
and
gamma
rays
by
inverse
Compton
interactionswith
cosmic-
ray
electrons.
'»
Anotheris
tomakethe
universe
opaque
to
high-energy
photons,
above
2
x10'4
eV,
becauseofpositron-electron
pair
creation
by
photon-photon
interactions.
'~"
A
thirdeffectis
to
deplete
the
density
of
en-
ergetic
electrons
by
the
energy
losses
inthe
inverse
Compton
interactions.
'~'
Hoyle'
also
consideredtheeffectofthe
thermalradiation
oncosmic-ray
protons,
butconcluded
thatthe
timescale
for
energy
degradation
is
greater
than
the
expansion
time
oftheuniverse
forall
protons
up
to
10
'
eV.This
conclusion
is
wrong
becausehe
only
considered
the
proton
Comp-
ton
effect
and
neglected
two
stronger
proces-
ses,namely
pair
creationand
photopion
pro-
duction,
whichwenowwish
toexamine.
The
threshold
energy
for
pion
production
by
protons
on
photons
of
energy
7
x10
~
eV
(the
mean
energy
ofblack-bodyradiation
at
3'K)
is
10'
eV,
andsome
pion
production
occurs
at
lesser
proton
energies
because
ofthe
high-
frequency
tail
ofthe
photon
spectrum.
The
crosssectionrises
rapidly
abovethe
thresh-
old
p
going
through
a
peak
exc
ceding
400
p,
b
at
the
~„~
resonance
(2.
3
x10'0-eV
proton
en-
ergy
on
7
x10
'-eV
photon),
anddescending
thereafter
toabout
200
p.
b,
aboutwhich
mi-
nor
wiggles
occur
owing
tothe
superposition
of
higher
resonances.
With
a
mean
cross
sec-
tion
of
200
pb
and
a
photon
density
of
550
cm
the
mean
path
for
interaction
is
(nv)
'
=9
x10'4
cm.
However,
the
distance
scalefor
loss
of
energy
is
L
=(E/AE)(nv)
',
E
being
theinitial
proton
energy
andAE
the
energy
loss
per
in-
teraction.
Atthe
thresholdfor
single-pion
production,
~/E
is
only
0.
13,
but
it
rises
to
an
average
valueof0.
22
at
the
-,
',
-,
reso-
nance,
andcontinues
torise
thereafter
as
multiple
pions
are
produced
ormore
kinetic
energy
is
given
to
a,
single
pion.
L
is
there-
foreon
the
order
of
4x10"
cm,
andthe
time
sca.
lefor
energy
lossis
10"
sec,
which
is
several
hundredtimesless
than
the
expansion
time
of
theuniverse.
Lisalsomore
than
an
order
of
magnitude
less
than
the
distanceto
the
nearest
quasar.
There
is
abundant
evidence
that
above
10"
eV,
the
cosmic
rays
arenotconfined
to
the
galaxy;
the
local
intensity
is
a
sample
ofthe
fluxin
a
much
larger
sphere.
If
thesources
of
very
high-energy
particles
are
uniformly
distributedin
space
and
time,
the
effectof
interactionslikethose
describedhereisto
deplete
the
spectrum
by
a
factor
equal
tothe
ratioof
thetime
scale
for
energy
lossto
one-
thirdtheexpansion
time.
If,
ontheother
hand,
thesourcesofsuch
particles
exist
only
far
backintime
or
at
great
distances,
thedeple-
tion
is
much
stronger.
It
may
alsobe
noted
that
if
the
primeval-fireballmodelis
correct,
going
back
in
time
raisesthemean
photon
en-
ergy
as
(1-t/T)
'
and
the
photon
density
as
(1
t/T),
T
bein—
g
theexpansion
time;
thus
theeffect
may
be
somewhat
larger
than
our
computations
on
a
staticmodel
indicate.
It
shouldbenotedthatthecutinthe
spectrum
dueto
photopion
processes
is
rather
sharp,
because
of
the
steepness
of
the
high-frequency
tail
of
the
Planckdistribution.
Only
1%
of
the
photons
have
energies
exceeding
3times
themean
value;also,
closetothe
threshold
thecrosssection
issmallerthan
200
p,
band
thefractional
energy
loss
per
interaction
is
a
minimum.Therefore,
below
3
&10"
eVthe
process
shouldhave
acompletelynegligible
effectonthe
proton
spectrum.
As
10'
eVis
approached,
the
effectshouldrise
rapidly',
andabove
2
x
1
0
eVp
it
shouldbea,factor
ofseveralhundred.At
present
thedata
above
10'9
eVarerather
sparse,
andthe
highest
energy
recordedis
represented
by
asingle
event
at
10'0
eV.
'
A
smoothrepresentation
andextrapolation
of
thespectrum
gives
an
integra,
l
frequency
of
about
oneeventon
100
VOLUME
16,
NUMBER
17
PHYSICAL
REVIEWLETTERS
2$
APRIL
1966
km'
inone
year
atenergies
above
2
x10
eV.
Ifthisnumber
is
cut
by
a
factor
ofseveral
hundred,owing
to
the
y-p
reaction,
the
rate
willbefar
toolowto
be
detected
by
any
of
the
methods
yet
proposed;
eventhe
oneevent
recorded
at
10'
eV
appears
surprising.
Onecannot
save
the
day
for
superhigh-en-
ergy
cosmic
rays
by
calling
on
heavy
nuclei.
The
thresholdfor
photodisintegrationagainst
photons
of7
&10
~
eVis
only
5x10'8
eV/nu-
cleon,
and
at
10"
eV/nucleon
mostof
the
photons
can
excitethe
giant
dipole
resonance,
forwhichthecross
sectionison
the
order
of10
"
cm'.
Atthis
energy
the
mean
path
for
photodisintegration
is
on
theorder
of
2
x10
'
cm,
much
lessthanthe
sizeof
the
gal-
axy.
Evennuclei5
timesless
energetic
would
be
decomposed
in
a
time
short
compared
with
theexpansion
timeof
the
universe,owing
to
thehigh-frequency
tail
of
the
black-body
spec-
trum.
Ordinary
optical
interstellarradiationcan
also
produce
y-p
photopions
and
heavy
nucleus
disintegrations,
at
energies
1000times
less
than
those
discussed
above;
buttheintergalac-
tic
opticalphoton
density
is
smallerthan
that
ofthe
3'
radiation
by
a
factor
ofabout5x10,
and
the
mean
paths
are
correspondingly
longer.
So
the
effectonthe
proton
spectrum
is
negli-
gible,
but
notthe
effect
on
the
heavy
nuclei:
Above
10"
eV/nucleon
themeantime
for
pho-
todisintegration
is
an
order
of
magnitude
less
thantheexpansion
time.
Nuclei
confinedin
the
galaxy
encounter
ahigherdensity
of
optical
photons
and
are
fragmented
much
faster.
In
addition
to
photopion
interactionsas
a
source
of
energy
lossto
high-energyprotons,
one
should
consider
pair
production
by
the
thermal
photons.
The
proton
energy
threshold
forthis
reaction
against
photons
of
7x10
eV
is
only
7
x10"
eV.
The
energy
lossinthe
laboratorysystem
arises
primarily
from
the
small
longitudinal
momentum
given
to
the
pro-
ton
initsrestsystem.
At
the
thresholdthe
fractional
energy
loss
is
2m/M=10
',
where
mand
M
arethe
electron
andproton
masses.
At
higher
energies
the
energy
loss
depends
onthe
relative
velocity
ofthe
electronand
positron
andthe
transverse
momentum
given
tothe
proton,
but
the
average
energy
loss
in
the
laboratory
is
approximately
constant,
making
the
fractional
energy
loss
f
=
10'/x,
wherex
is
theratio
of
the
proton
energy
to
its
thresholdvalue.Thecrosssection
with
no
screeningis
approximately
1.
8X
10
27(lm
-0.
5)
cm'.
Therefore,
thescale
length
for
energy
lossis
given
by
L
=
(nfl)
'=
10
7
x
(1ruc
-0.
5)
'
cm.The
minimum
valueofLoccurs
atx
=4.
5or
E
=3x10'
eV
andis
about
half
of
theHubble
length.Thus,
the
effect
on
the
primary
spectrum
is
barelysignificant,
cre-
atinga
small
depression
(neverexceeding
a
factor
ofabout
3)
intheinterval
10"-10"
eV.
Eventhissmall
depletion
oftheflux
above
10"
eV,
however,
followed
above
5x10'9
eV
by
a
strongerdepression
dueto
the
photopion
process,
makesthe
observed'
flattening
of
the
primary
spectrum
inthe
range
10'
-10'
eV
quite
remarkable.The
injectionspectrum
of
the
intergalactic
flux
mustbemuchless
steep
than
that
of
the
galactic
particles
which
dominate
at
lower
energies.
Theauthor
expresses
thanks
for
thehospi-
tality
of
the
Physics
Department
ofthe
Univer-
sity
of
Utah,
where
this
Letter
waswritten.
J.
Linsley,
Phys.
Rev.Letters
10,
146
(1963);
and
in
Proceedings
oftheInternational
Conferenceon
Cos-
mic
Rays,
Jaipur
1963,
edited
by
R.R.
Daniel
etal.
(Commercial
Printing
Press,
Ltd.
,
Bombay,
India,
1964-1965),
Vol.
IV,
p,
77.
C.
B.
A.
McCuskerand
K,
Greisen,
in
Proceedings
of
theInternationalConference
on
Cosmic
Rays,
Lon-
don,
September,
1965
(to
be
published);
and
S.
Col-
gate,
private
communication.
3A.
A.
Penziasand
R.W.Wilson,
Astrophys.
J.
142,
419
(1965).
4P.
G.
Rolland
D.
T.
Wilkinson,
Phys.
Rev.Letters
16,
405
(1966).
R.
H.Dicke,P.
J.E.Peebles,
P.
G.Roll,
and
D.
T.
Wilkinson,
Astrophys.
J.
142,
414
(1965).
8Private
communicationfrom
Penziasand
Wilson,
reported
in
Ref.
4.
J.
E.
Felten,
Phys.
Rev.Letters
15,
1003
(1965).
R.
J.
Gould
and
G.
Schrbder,
Phys.
Rev.Letters
16,
253
(1966).
~F.
Hoyle,Phys.
Rev.
Letters
15,
131
(1965).
R.
J.Gould,
Phys.
Rev.Letters
15,
511
(1965)'.
~~J.
V.
Jelley,Phys.
Rev.Letters
16,
479
(1966).
R.
R.
Wilson,
Phys.
Rev.
110,
1212
(1958).
750
Discussion
Particles having energies above $10^{18}$ eV are the so-called ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECR). The UHECR are the most energetic particles known in the Universe.
Spectrum of UHECR as observed by HiRes, TA and Auger experiments (as labeled). One can clearly observe a drop in the spectrum for Cosmic Ray energies above $10^{20}$ eV. K. Greisen's prediction was experimentally observed by three different experiments.
![GZK cutoff](https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March14/Aloisio/Figures/figure5.jpg)
Today the upper limit on the energy of Cosmic Rays is called **Greisen–Zatsepin–Kuzmin limit (GZK limit)**. Several months later G. Zatsepin and V. A. Kuzmin published
[Upper Limit of the Spectrum of Cosmic Rays](http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1624/article_24846.pdf).
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), discovered in 1966 by A. Penzias and R. Wilson, corresponds to the remnant photons of the Big Bang and acts like a black body spectrum with temperature T$_{\mathrm{CMB}} \simeq$ 2.73 K. At the highest energies, the Universe is no longer transparent to Cosmic Rays, that start interacting with the CMB photons.
![CMB](http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/ContentMedia/990015b.jpg)
The main reactions causing energy losses while the CR propagation are:
* Compton interactions of nuclei
* Pair production
* Photodisintegration of the nucleus
* Photopion production
In the case of UHECR the reaction that has the most influence on the spectrum is photopion production given by the following interactions:
\begin{eqnarray*}
p +\gamma_{\text{CMB}} &\longrightarrow& \Delta^+ \longrightarrow p + \pi_0\\
p +\gamma_{\text{CMB}} &\longrightarrow& \Delta^+ \longrightarrow n + \pi^+\\
p +\gamma_{\text{CMB}} &\longrightarrow& \Delta^{++} +\pi^- \longrightarrow p + \pi^+ + \pi^-\,\,
\end{eqnarray*}where $p$ is the UHECR and $\gamma_{\text{CMB}}$ are the CMB photons.
Spectrum of cosmic rays as a function of their energy given by several different experiments.
![Cosmic Ray Spectrum](http://www.iexp.uni-hamburg.de/groups/astroparticle/score/images/spectrum.png)
We can easily determine the distance scale for energy loss given by:\begin{eqnarray*}\lambda_{E}=\frac{1}{\kappa \rho_{\gamma} \sigma_{\text{p}\gamma}}\end{eqnarray*}where $\kappa$ is the inelasticity (fraction of the initial energy available for the production of new particles), $\rho_\gamma$ is the CMB photon density, and $\sigma_{\text{p}\gamma}$ is the mean p-$\gamma$ interaction cross section. Using these values we find that $\lambda_{E}\simeq 10^{25}\,\textrm{cm}\simeq 3.24\, \textrm{Mpc}$.
For each distance $\lambda_{E}$ the CR will loose 22% of its energy due to interactions with the CMB. The distance obtained corresponds to a characteristic time scale for energy loss of the order of $10^{15}$ s which is several orders of magnitude smaller than the age of the Universe ($4.3\times10^{17}$ s). This result could indicate that super GZK CRs:
* There are near sources that we have not identified yet. Protons arriving at Earth with super-GZK energies must come from sources situated at less than $\sim 100\,Mpc$ away.
* At the cutoff, the “visible” universe shrinks to a sphere of a few tens of Mpc of radius. This feature should be reflected in the energy spectrum of cosmic rays as a sharp drop.
As a simple exercise, one can calculate the threshold energy of protons (we consider the UHECR to be a proton) for the photopion production. It is easy to obtain the mean energy for the CMB. We know that the CMB has a temperature of $T_{\gamma} \simeq \, 2.73$ and a mean wavelength of $\lambda_{\gamma}= 1.96\,mm$, from which we can compute the mean energy as $E_{\gamma} = hc/\lambda_{\gamma} \simeq 6.34 \times 10^{-4} \, eV$.
Considering the proton and photon 4-momenta we have that the energy in the center of mass (CM) is given by:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\label{gzk1}
\left( p_{\text{p}} + p_{\gamma} \right)^{\mu}\left( p_{\text{p}} + p_{\gamma} \right)_{\mu} &=& m_{\text{p}}^2c^2 + 2\frac{E_{\text{p}}E_{\gamma}}{c^2}-2\vec{p}_{\text{p}}\cdot\vec{p}_{\gamma}
\end{eqnarray*}where $E_{\text{p}}$ is the energy, $m_{\text{p}}$ is the mass, and $\vec{p}_{\text{p}}$ is the three-dimensional momentum of the proton in the laboratory frame, and similarly for the photon. We can write the equation:\begin{eqnarray*}
\label{gzk2}
\left( p_{\text{p}} + p_{\gamma} \right)^{\mu}\left( p_{\text{p}} + p_{\gamma} \right)_{\mu} &=& m_{\text{p}}^2c^2 + 2\frac{E_{\text{p}}E_{\gamma}}{c^2} \left( 1- \cos{\theta} \right)
\end{eqnarray*}where we have used the fact that protons are ultrarelativistic so $\beta \approx 1$. To find the threshold energy of this reaction we use the above equations and we assume a frontal collision $\theta=\pi$. We know that the threshold energy in the center of mass for this reaction is given by $\sqrt{s}=\left(m_{\text{p}}+m_{\pi^0}\right)c$. Finally we have that the threshold energy for the protons is given by:\begin{eqnarray*}
\label{gzk3}
4\frac{E_{\text{p}}E_{\gamma}}{c^2} + m_{\text{p}}^2c^2 &=& \left( m_{\text{p}} + m_{\pi^0} \right)^2c^2
\end{eqnarray*}and the solution to of this equation for $E_{\text{p}}$ is:\begin{eqnarray*}
\label{gzk4}
E_{\text{p}} &=&\frac{m_{\pi^0}\left( 2m_{\text{p}} + m_{\pi^0} \right)c^4}{4E_{\gamma}}\,\,.
\end{eqnarray*}Using the mean energy for the CMB we find that $E_{\text{p}}\simeq 1.07\times 10^{20}$ eV.
We have found that protons with energies equal or higher than $10^{20}$ eV will interact with the CMB thus losing part of their energy.