FERMAT'S LIBRARY
Journal Club
Librarian
Margins
Log in
Join our newsletter to receive a new paper every week
Comments
Ask a question or post a comment about the paper
Join the discussion! Ask questions and share your comments.
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Facebook
Sign in with email
Particles having energies above $10^{18}$ eV are the so-called ultr...
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), discovered in 1966 by A. Pen...
The main reactions causing energy losses while the CR propagation a...
We can easily determine the distance scale for energy loss given by...
As a simple exercise, one can calculate the threshold energy of pro...
Spectrum of UHECR as observed by HiRes, TA and Auger experiments (a...
Today the upper limit on the energy of Cosmic Rays is called **Grei...
VOLUME
16,
NUMBER
17
PHYSICAL
REVIEW
LETTERS
25
APRiL
1966
tons.
When
the
complete
potential
is
deformed,
the
optical
parameters
(Table
I)
found
so
far
to
give
the
best
fit
to
the
elastic
polarization
also
produce
the
best
prediction
of
inelastic
asymmetry.
All
the
curves
in
Fig.
2
use
a
central-well
deformation
parameter
of
P,
=0.
39
for
~si
and
P,
=
0.
22
for
~Ni.
The
deformation
parameter
of
the
spin-orbit
term
is
1.
5
times
the
central-
well
value,
which
produces
slightly
better
agree-
ment
with
the
asymmetry
data
for
"Si.
Both
real
and
imaginary
parts
of
the
spin-orbit
in-
teraction
are
included,
but
since
i
W~I
«VS,
the
imaginary
part
makes
little
difference.
The
curves
also
include
Coulomb-excitation
amplitudes,
'
which
make
little
difference
in
either
the
asymmetry
or
the
cross
section.
We
find
that
for
all
of
the
calculations
made,
the
predictions
of
inelastic
asymmetry
and
inelastic
polarization
are
very
nearly
identi-
cal.
In
summary
we
find
that,
provided
the
imag-
inary
and
spin-orbit
terms
are
included,
the
collective-model
generalization
of
the
optical
potential
gives
a
good
account
of
the
present
inelastic
asymmetry
data
at
all
but
the
most
forward
angles.
It
is
quite
possible
that
a
more
comprehensive
treatment
of
the
spin-de-
pendent
interaction
will
improve
matters
in
this
region,
and
such
calculations
are
in
pro-
gress.
It
is
a
pleasure
to
acknowledge
many
useful
conversations
concerning
this
work
with
G.
R.
Satchler
and
N.
M.
Hi.
ntz.
We
are
much
indebted
to
the
indefatigable
ORIC
cyclotron
operators,
and
to
M.
B.
Marshall,
W.
H.
White,
I.
B.
Schneider,
and
A.
W.
Riikola
of
the
ORIC
staff,
for
their
essential
contributions
to
the
experi-
mental
effort.
*Research
sponsored
by
the
U.
S.
Atomic
Energy
Com-
mission
under
contract
with
the
Union
Carbide
Corpora-
tion.
)Oak
Ridge
Graduate
Fellow
from
the
University
of
Minnesota
under
appointment
from
Oak
Ridge
Asso-
ciated
Universities.
f.
Graduate
Fellow
from
the
University
of
Tennessee
under
appointment
from
the
National
Science
Founda-
tion.
~R.
H.
Bassel,
G.
R.
Satchler,
R.
M.
Drisko,
and
E.
Rost,
Phys.
Rev.
128,
2693
(1962).
The
present
DW
calculations
include
the
spin-orbit
term
in
the
elag+ic
distortion.
M.
P.
Fricke
and
G.
R.
Satchler,
Phys.
Rev.
139,
B567
(1965).
3T.
Stovall
and
N.
M.
Hintz,
Phys.
Rev.
135,
B330
(1964).
See,
for
example,
W.
S.
Gray,
R.
A.
Kenefick,
J.
J.
Kraushaar,
and
G.
R.
Satchler,
Phys.
Rev.
142,
735
(1966);
G.
R.
Satchler,
to
be
published.
5E.
R.
Flynn
and
R.
H.
Bassel,
Phys.
Rev.
Letters
15,
168
(1965),
and
other
references
given
there.
6L.
N.
Blumberg,
E.
E.
Gross,
A.
van
der
Woude,
and
A.
Zucker,
Nucl.
Instr.
5
Methods
~39
125
(1966);
L.
N.
Blumberg,
E.
E.
Gross,
A.
van
der
Woude,
A.
Zucker,
and
R.
H.
Bassel,
to
be
published.
END
TO
THE
COSMIC-RAY
SPECTRUM'~
Kenneth
Greisen
Cornell
University,
Ithaca,
New
York
(Received
1
April
1966)
The
primary
cosmic-ray
spectrum
has
been
measured
up
to
an
energy
of
10'
eV,
'
and
sev-
eral
groups
have
described
projects
under
de-
velopment
or
in
mind'
to
investigate
the
spec-
trum
further,
into
the
energy
range
10"-10"
eV.
This
note
predicts
that
above
10'
eV
the
pri-
mary
spectrum
will
steepen
abruptly,
and
the
experiments
in
preparation
will
at
last
observe
it
to
have
a
cosmologically
meaningful
termi.
-
nation.
The
cause
of
the
catastrophic
cutoff
is
the
intense
isotropic
radiation
first
detected
by
Penzias
and
Wilson'
at
4080
Mc/sec
(7.
35
cm)
and
now
confirmed
as
thermal
in
character
by
measurements
of
Roll
and
Wilkinson4
at
3.
2
cm
wavelength.
It
is
not
essential
to
the
pres-
ent
argument
that
the
origin
of
this
radiation
conform
exactly
to
the
primeval-fireball
mod-
el
outlined
by
Dicke,
Peebles,
Roll,
and
Vfil-
kinson',
what
matters
is
only
that
the
radia-
tion
exists
and
pervades
the
observable
uni-
verse.
The
transparency
of
space
at
the
per-
tinent
wavelengths,
and
the
consistency
of
in-
tensity
observations
in
numerous
directions,
748