4
change according to how we hold the cup. While such
deviations will be investigated in the Suppressing Res-
onance section and the Model Studies section, for now,
we stick to the so-called “normal hand” posture, as illus-
trated in Fig 6a.
In this research, two methods were employed in or-
der to measure the acceleration of the cup during loco-
motion. The first method, which turned out to be un-
successful, was to utilize image processing tools. The
idea was to track the center of mass of the cup while
the cup holder casually walked. That way, it would be
possible to extract the time plot of the cup’s position,
and subsequently, the time plot of the acceleration of the
cup (by taking a second order derivative of the position
data). However, this method was unsuccessful due to
two main reasons. First, the image data was not sensi-
tive enough. If the data is obtained over a long distance,
one would inevitably have to zoom-out; this directly re-
duces the number of pixels by which the position data
is recorded, and results in an extremely “smoothed-out”
data plot. On the other hand, if we zoom in as much
as we want to, the data collection time span is greatly
limited. Unfortunately, we are stuck in a Heisenberg
uncertainty principle-like situation in which we cannot
achieve both measurements with desired quality at the
same time. Second, the visual data was limited to only
one plane of oscillation. Although the plane parallel to
the walking direction is indeed where most of the action
occurs, it would be better if data from all three planes
of oscillation could be acquired as well. Such issues were
solved by adopting the second method: utilizing an ac-
celerometer [13].
The second method proved to be quite successful. The
apparatus, as shown in Fig 6a, is straightforward. By
fixing an accelerometer (or, equivalently, a smartphone)
to the top of the mug, we record all three directions of
acceleration. Since the mug is a hard body, we expect the
acceleration measured on any part of the mug to be equal;
the accelerometer was also strapped to the bottom of the
mug in order to verify that the experiment results were
indeed independent of the position of the accelerometer
[14].
Representative acceleration plots in each orientation
and their respective FFT analysis results are presented
in Fig 6b and Fig 6c. Here, the y-axis is the walking
direction, the z-axis is the direction perpendicular to the
ground, and the x-axis is the remaining sideways direc-
tion. From the acceleration time plot, the difference in
the maximum magnitude of acceleration in each axis is
highlighted. The z-axis acceleration has the biggest mag-
nitude, and the x-axis acceleration is almost negligible in
magnitude compared to the other two. This matches our
expectations, since the up-and-down motion of walking
is visually much larger than that of sideways swaying.
According to the results of H. Pontzer and Lieberman
[9], the frequency of the z-axis oscillation should be syn-
chronized with our lower-body movements. Another in-
teresting observation can be made from the frequency
spectrum in each axis. In the acceleration time plot, the
z-axis oscillation seems to have a smaller frequency than
the y-axis oscillation; this is counter-intuitive, since we
expect the cup motion to be have the same frequency
as our body (up-and-down oscillation) itself. In order
to shine a light on such observation, a FFT analysis is
conducted on each acceleration plot.
Indeed, the FFT results are quite enlightening. Let
us first take note of the y-axis frequency spectrum [Fig
6c]. Evidently, the cup does not oscillate at the same fre-
quency of our body. In fact, the motion is not even close
to being purely sinusoidal: at least five or more distinct
harmonic frequencies are contained in the motion. This
directly goes against the daily assumption that our hand
simply goes up and down when we walk. Instead, the
cup-carrying hand undergoes a complex oscillation that
is less than perfectly synchronized with our bodily mo-
tions. We should note that such intricate oscillations do
not stem from the arm itself, but rather the extra degree
of freedom that the wrist allows in the cup motion. An-
other significant observation is made by examining the
specific values of the frequency components in the y-axis
oscillation. Among the distinct harmonic frequencies, the
second harmonic frequency coincides with 3.5 4Hz, which
is the resonance frequency of coffee in regular sized [5]
cylindrical cups. In other words, as we casually walk,
our hand oscillates in such a way that resonates with the
first antisymmetric mode of coffee oscillation; thus, the
likelihood of coffee spilling is maximized. It is impor-
tant to realize that resonance would not likely occur if
higher-frequency modes did not exist in our hand mo-
tion. For example, would one still spill coffee if the cup
was strapped around one’s waist? The answer is prob-
ably “no”, since, as we saw in the introduction, coffee
does not spill as much when it is simply driven at 2Hz.
Again, the particularity of the cup motion that allows
higher-frequency oscillation is highlighted.
Now we shift our focus to the other two results [Fig
6c]. First, the z-axis oscillation clearly exhibits a dom-
inant frequency close to 1.7Hz. There also exist higher
frequencies, but they are rather insignificant compared
to the dominant frequency. This is reflected in our ex-
perience that the walking motion is largely composed of
up-and-down motions, and that the frequency of such
up-and-down motion is what we normally perceive to
be the walking frequency. Although it cannot initiate
a significant level of coffee sloshing, the z-axis oscillation
at 1.7Hz can still amplify the first antisymmetric mode
in two ways. First, since 1.7Hz is close to half of the
resonance frequency, the z-axis oscillation can increase
the amplitude of the coffee once every two cycles after
the first antisymmetric mode is excited by y-axis oscilla-
tions. Second, there is the possibility of subharmonic res-
onance, as in the parametrically driven pendulum [[15],
[16]]. However, such behavior was neither experimen-
tally nor mathematically investigated thoroughly in this
research. Next, it is notable that the x-axis oscillation
has a dominant frequency of approximately 1Hz, which