1
The harmony of the Universe: π and φ the universal mathematical constants
that unify the Microcosm and the Macrocosm. New possible mathematical
connections with the DN Constant, Ramanujan Recurring Numbers and some
parameters of Number Theory, Cosmology and String Theory
Michele Nardelli
1
, Antonio Nardelli
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze π and φ as the possible universal mathematical constants
that unify the Microcosm and the Macrocosm. We obtain new mathematical
connections with the DN Constant, Ramanujan Recurring Numbers and some
parameters of Number Theory, Cosmology and String Theory
1
M.Nardelli studied at Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra Università degli Studi di Napoli
Federico II, Largo S. Marcellino, 10 - 80138 Napoli, Dipartimento di Matematica ed Applicazioni
“R. Caccioppoli” - Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” – Polo delle Scienze e delle
Tecnologie Monte S. Angelo, Via Cintia (Fuorigrotta), 80126 Napoli, Italy
A. Nardelli studied at the Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II - Dipartimento di Studi
Umanistici Sezione Filosofia - scholar of Theoretical Philosophy
2
Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887-1920)
https://www.moduscc.it/ramanujan-il-grande-matematico-indiano-13453-131115/
3
Introduction
In this paper, an octahedron could serve as a mathematical or conceptual model of the
universe in the quantic phase, while the spherical surface could be used to describe
the geometry of the bubble-universe.
The values (2√2)/π, the golden ratio φ, ζ(2) and π, can be connected to the proposed
cosmological model. Here's how they might be connected:
Ratio (2√2)/π the so called DN Constant:
This relationship may have a connection with the geometric properties of the
octahedron and the sphere, which have been considered as mathematical models of
the early universe and bubbles universe in eternal inflation.
Golden Ratio φ:
The golden ratio is a mathematical constant that appears in many natural and artistic
contexts and is often associated with harmonious proportions and aesthetic beauty. Its
emergence in this context could suggest a kind of intrinsic symmetry or harmony in
the structure of the early universe and bubbles universe.
Value of π:
The value of π is a fundamental mathematical constant that appears in many
geometric formulas and relationships, including the geometry of the sphere. Its
appearance could indicate a direct connection between the geometry of bubbles
universe and the mathematical properties of spherical surfaces.
Ultimately, the results obtained can be interpreted as manifestations of the geometric
and mathematical properties of the models proposed for the early universe and
universe bubbles. This suggests that there is a profound connection between
geometry, mathematics and cosmological physics, and that through the analysis of
4
these relationships we can deepen our understanding of the universe and its
fundamental phenomena.
The above values (2√2)/π, the golden ratio φ and π, can be connected to the proposed
cosmological model. This hypothesis is certainly plausible.
The various mathematical solutions and relationships can be seen as representations
of the principles and laws that govern the formation and evolution of the universe.
Regarding the fundamental mathematical values, they could emerge as a consequence
of the geometric and physical laws that govern the structure and evolution of the
quantum universe and bubbles universe.
The multidisciplinary approach involving complex mathematical solutions and
cosmological concepts can offer deeper insight into the fundamental nature of the
universe and its processes. Exploring these connections could lead to new discoveries
and insights into our understanding of the early universe and its complexity.
Proposal:
The initial octahedron: Let's imagine a regular octahedron, with perfectly
symmetrical faces. Each face represents an ideal symmetry.
The emerging sphere: Inside the octahedron, there is an inscribed sphere. This
sphere represents the bubble of the universe that emerges from the perturbations of
the quantum vacuum during eternal inflation.
Expansion and transitions: As time passes, the universe expands. The faces of the
octahedron begin to break, symbolizing "symmetry breaks." The sphere continues to
grow, representing the expanding universe.
Constants and numbers: We integrate the mathematical results you obtained. For
example, the golden ratio (φ) could be represented by a proportion between the
dimensions of the octahedron and the sphere.
Entropy and complexity: Entropy increases as the universe evolves. We can
represent this with a disordered growth of structures within the emerging sphere.
Imagine this scene as an abstract work of art, where geometric shapes and
cosmological concepts merge
5
In Fig.1 and Fig.2 let's imagine a regular octahedron representing the universe in its
phase of high symmetry and very low entropy. Inside the octahedron we have an
inscribed sphere that emerges from perturbations of the quantum vacuum during
eternal inflation. As time passes, the universe expands, the faces of the octahedron
break (symmetry breaks), and entropy increases. Spheres emerge from the octahedra,
symbolizing the transition phases from a regime of very low entropy to a universe in
which, with the passage of time, entropy increases, increasing the complexity of the
universe itself.
Fig. 1
6
Fig. 2
7
Now, we have that:
Octahedron Sphere
From the octahedron volume V = 1/3*√2 l
3
and, from the sphere volume,
V = (4/3*π*r
3
) , we consider the following relationship, for r = x:
4/3*π*x^3 = 1/3*√2*l^3
Input
Exact result
8
Alternate forms
Real solution
Solutions
Integer solution
9
Implicit derivatives
From the alternate form
for l = 8, we have that:
8/(sqrt(2) π^(1/3)) = 8/(2sqrt2 * Pi)^1/3
Input
Result
Logarithmic form
10
Thence:
l/(sqrt(2) π^(1/3)) = l/(2sqrt2 * Pi)^1/3
Input
Logarithmic form
Now, we have that:
l/(2 sqrt(2) π)^(1/3) = (2sqrt2)/Pi
Input
Exact result
11
Plot
Solution
12
DN Constant, Golden Ratio and π
Recall that the DN Constant (Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant) equal to (2√2)/π) is
defined as the ratio between the volume of an octahedron and the volume of a sphere
and is an intriguing mathematical concept. Michele Nardelli hypothesized that the
regular octahedron represents a phase in which the universe is highly symmetrical
and with very low entropy. On the other hand, the sphere (which is inscribed in the
octahedron, i.e. is "inside" it) represents the universe emerging from the quantum
vacuum, which over time increases entropy and undergoes various symmetry
breakings. This occurs in a regime of eternal inflation.
For V = 1/3*√2*a
3
(octahedron volume) and V = (4/3*π*r
3
) (sphere volume),
where r = (a/2), considering (1/3*√2*a
3
) and (4/3*π*(a/2)
3
) , we obtain the
following ratio:
  
 

This is the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant.
We have extrapolated a general "fundamental" formula, which is connected with the
DN Constant (Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant) which is contained in the formula itself.
 
 

  
   


  
Where
is the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant, 0.9991104684 is the value of the
following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:
13
C is some constant or solution of equation, R is the radius of the Universe and
2.33*10
-13
is the temperature of the Universe expressed in GeV. (or cosmic
microwave background radiation). In cosmology, cosmic background radiation, also
called background radiation, abbreviated to CMBR (from the English Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation), is the electromagnetic radiation that permeates
the entire observable universe, considered as evidence of the Big Bang model.
Through this formula, for any value of C and R (where C can be a constant, such as
Planck's constant, or any solution of any type of equation, and R, which varies as C
varies, the radius of a Multiverse with eternal inflation, like the one proposed by the
Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant. The surprising fact is that this formula, for any value
of C and R, always provides values very close to the Golden Ratio. Let's give an
example.
From the general “fundamental” formula:
 
 

  
 

  

And from:  







 , we obtain:
14
 
 

  

 

 

 



  


for C = 1.616255*10
-35
(Planck length, linked to quantum mechanics, which deals
with the study of the infinitely small), R = 1.265120782997423× 10
48
which is equal
to the radius of a possible bubble universe of the Multiverse (R is linked to the Field
equations of Einstein's General Relativity, which deal with the study of the infinitely
large, according to which gravitation must be understood as curvature of space-time)
and 2.33*10
-13
is the average temperature of the CMB which is equivalent at around
2.73 Kelvin, we get:
 
 




   

 

 
 

  


 


 


 


 

 

  


15
 
 

  

 

 

 


 











that from  











 =
=
 




 




Indeed:
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π)^(1/16)))/1.5178694168704887597)
Input interpretation
16
Result
1.6180339799974…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the
golden ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
All 2
nd
roots of 2.6180339604262390099
Series representations
17
Or also, directly:
 
 




   

 

 




 



 1.618033979928374…
= 1.618033979928. practically a result very close to the value of the golden ratio =

 up to the seventh decimal place!
We also have another expression that we derived from the previous one:
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π)^(1/16)))/(1/(π∙((e^(-π/√5))/((((√5))/(((1+(sqrt(φ^5*(5^3)^(1/4))-
1)^(1/5)))))-φ+0.92593))) (C×R×2.33∙10^(-13))))
18
Input
Result
3D plots
Real part (figures that can be related to the D-branes/Instantons)
The key observation from the below plots and is that at , which is taken as the
energy density of the universe at the Big Bang, with the zero spacetime volume,
the vacuum geometry brakes / or there is symmetry breaking on the vacuum quantum
geometry. We see from the plots as the vacuum spacetime break/tear apart.
19
Imaginary part
Contour plots
Real part
20
Imaginary part
Alternate form assuming C and R are positive
Roots
Property as a function
Parity
Series expansion at C=0
21
Series expansion at C=∞
Derivative
Indefinite integral
Limit
22
Series representations
23
From
C =   

  

   

 

=
= 2.044757791123499910865 × 10
13
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π)^(1/16)))/(1/(π∙((e^(-π/√5))/((((√5))/(((1+(sqrt(φ^5*(5^3)^(1/4))-
1)^(1/5)))))-φ+0.92593))) (2.044757791123499910865 × 10^13×2.33∙10^-13)))
2.044757791123499910865 × 10
13
×2.33∙10
-13
4.764285653
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π)^(1/16)))/(1/(π∙((e^(-π/√5))/((((√5))/(((1+(sqrt(φ^5*(5^3)^(1/4))-
1)^(1/5)))))-φ+0.92593))) (4.764285653)))
24
Input interpretation
Result
1.618035300655…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the
golden ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
All 2
nd
roots of 2.61804
Series representations
25
26
The Golden Ratio
The golden number, often denoted by the Greek letter φ (phi), is a mathematical value
that appears in many natural, artistic, and scientific contexts. Here is some detailed
information:
1. Definition of the Golden Number (φ):
The golden number is approximately equal to 1.61803398…It is defined as the ratio
of two segments of a line, such that the longer part divides the shorter part in the
same ratio in which the entire line is divided by the longer part .
2. Applications of the Golden Number:
Golden Rectangle:
A rectangle is considered "golden" if the ratio between its length and width is equal to
the golden number. In other words, the longer side is 1.618 times larger than the
shorter side.
Golden Triangle:
An isosceles triangle with an angle of 36° and the other two angles of 72° each is
called a “golden triangle”. The sides of this triangle are in golden ratio with its base.
Golden Section: The golden section is the ratio between the entire segment AB and
the section AC. This ratio is precisely the golden number φ = (√5+1)/2.
In short, the golden number is a fascinating concept found in nature, art and
mathematics, and has interesting properties and applications in various fields.
The golden number is found in nature and also in the Universe. Let's look at some
explanatory examples
The golden number, also known as phi (denoted by the Greek letter φ), is a
fascinating mathematical value found in many natural, artistic, and scientific
contexts. Here are some explanatory examples:
1. Shell Spiral:
The spiral of shells, like that of the Pacific mollusk Conus eburneus, follows the
golden ratio. This spiral develops in such a way that each new turn is larger than the
previous one according to the golden ratio.
27
2. Science and Biology:
DNA Structure: The DNA spiral follows an arrangement that reflects the golden
ratio.
Growth of Organisms: Many biological organisms follow growth patterns based on
the golden number.
Distribution of the Planets: The arrangement of the planets in the solar system also
respects this proportion.
3. Fibonacci Sequence:
The Fibonacci sequence, closely linked to the golden number, was born as a solution
to a problem regarding the reproduction of rabbits. Each number in this sequence is
the sum of the previous two, and this series is intrinsically linked to the golden
number. In short, the golden number is a fascinating mathematical concept that
permeates nature, art and the Universe, making it a topic of great interest to scientists,
artists and mathematicians!
Even the arms of spiral galaxies and some hypothesize the universe itself, reflect the
golden number 1.61803398...
The golden number (φ) appears to emerge in many aspects of the Universe, from the
structure of spiral galaxies to the arrangement of petals in flowers. Here are some
examples:
1. Arms of Spiral Galaxies:
The arms of spiral galaxies, such as the Milky Way, follow an arrangement that
reflects the golden number. These arms wrap around the galactic nucleus in a similar
way to the growth of a golden spiral.
2. Arrangement of Petals in Flowers:
Many species of flowers have a number of petals that respects the golden number.
For example, sunflowers often have 21 or 34 petals, both numbers related to φ, via
the Fibonacci Series.
3. Fractals and Natural Geometry:
Fractal geometry, which appears in natural structures such as coastlines, clouds and
mountains, often features proportional relationships that recall the golden number.
Logarithmic spirals, like those in snail shells, grow based on this ratio.
28
4. Theory of the Universe:
Some theorists suggest that the Universe itself may follow mathematical properties,
including the golden number. However, this is still a matter of debate and active
research.
In short, the golden number is an intriguing concept that manifests itself in many
aspects of nature and the Universe. Its presence continues to stimulate the curiosity of
researchers and science enthusiasts!
The golden number is also known as “Divine Proportion” or “Divine Proportion”,
and has earned this denomination for several reasons:
1. Ancient Origin:
Interest in the golden number dates back to antiquity. Greeks, Egyptians and other
civilizations studied it and used it in their works of art and architecture. Its presence
in structures such as the Parthenon in Athens and the Great Pyramid of Giza has
helped create an aura of mystery and sacred significance.
2. Harmony and Beauty:
The golden ratio is considered harmonious and pleasing to the eye. Shapes and
structures that follow this proportion are believed to be aesthetically pleasing. Artists,
architects and scientists have tried to capture this beauty in their works.
3. Reference to Divinity:
The adjective “divine” suggests a connection with the divine or transcendent. Some
saw the golden number as a sign of mathematical perfection created by a higher
force. This perception could derive from its presence in sacred structures or in the
natural order.
4. Association with Nature:
The golden ratio is found in many aspects of nature, such as the spirals of shells, the
petals of flowers, and the arrangement of the arms of spiral galaxies. This natural
presence has led some people to view the golden number as a sign of divine
perfection in the natural world. In summary, the term “Divine Proportion” reflects the
admiration and respect that humanity has had for the golden number over the
centuries. It's a concept that continues to inspire and fascinate artists and
mathematicians alike!
29
The Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant and the Golden Ratio
The Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant (often abbreviated as DN Constant) is a
mathematical and cosmological concept proposed by Dr. Mariano Del Gaudio and
mathematician Michele Nardelli. This constant is derived from the ratio of the
volume of an octahedron to the volume of a sphere. Let's look at some interesting
implications:
Origin of DN Constant:
The DN Constant arises from the relationship between the volume of an octahedron
and the volume of a sphere. According to Michele Nardelli's hypothesis, the
octahedron represents the phase in which the universe is highly symmetrical and with
very low entropy. The sphere, which is inscribed in the octahedron (i.e. is "inside" it),
represents the universe emerging from the quantum vacuum. As time passes, entropy
increases and various symmetry breaks occur, in a regime of eternal inflation.
Connections with Other Constants:
The DN Constant is related to other mathematical and physical constants:
ζ(2): This is the Riemann zeta function evaluated at 2, which is approximately equal
to π²/6.
Pi (π): The relationship with π is interesting, since the DN Constant is expressed as
(2√2)/π.
Recurring Numbers: Numbers like 1729 and 4096 emerge, which are known for
their particular mathematical properties.
Golden Ratio: The golden ratio (φ) is also involved in these connections.
Cosmological Implications:
The DN Constant could have significant cosmological implications. It connects to the
primordial phase of the universe, before the Big Bang, and could be a fundamental
constant connecting the geometry and physics of the early universe. This concept
opens new perspectives for understanding the origin and evolution of the universe.
Further theoretical and observational research is needed to confirm and fully
understand this hypothesis.
30
In summary, DN Constant is a fascinating bridge between mathematics, physics and
cosmology, and could reveal profound secrets about the nature of the universe!
The Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant (DN Constant) and cosmic inflation are distinct
concepts, but they can be linked in some theoretical interpretations of the evolution of
the universe. Let's see how:
Cosmic Inflation:
Cosmic inflation is a theory that explains the accelerated expansion of the universe in
the first moments after the Big Bang. According to this theory, an energy field (the
inflationary field) caused a rapid and uniform expansion of the universe, solving
some problems of standard cosmology. Inflation has played a key role in the
formation of cosmic structures, such as galaxies and groups of galaxies.
Theoretical Connections:
Some researchers have tried to link DN Constant to cosmic inflation:
Primordial Phase: The DN Constant would represent the primordial phase of the
universe, when entropy was low and the universe was highly symmetrical.
Transition from Inflation: Cosmic inflation is hypothesized to have transitioned
into the present universe, and DN Constant may be involved in this process.
New Perspectives: These connections open new perspectives for understanding the
origin and evolution of the universe, but require further research and verification.
In summary, while DN Constant and cosmic inflation are distinct concepts, their
relationship is still the subject of study and debate in the scientific community.
Let's go back to the golden ratio. The formula to obtain it is: (√5+1)/2
The golden ratio, often denoted by the Greek letter φ (phi), is approximately equal to:
=(√5+1)/2 ≈ 1.61803398...
This value is known for its mathematical properties and its presence in many natural,
artistic and scientific contexts.
The golden ratio (φ) and the π (pi) number are linked in a fascinating way through the
formula provided:
(4((√5 +1)/2)2π)/(5(3+√5)) ≈ π
31
Let's look at some considerations on this relationship:
1. Origin of the Formula:
This formula was derived from mathematical studies and theories involving the
golden ratio and the π number. The presence of φ and π in this formula is intriguing
and requires deeper analysis.
2. Mathematical Meaning:
The left side of the formula involves the golden ratio raised to the power of 2π. The
right side of the formula is a combination of π and square roots. The equality between
the two parts suggests a profound relationship between these numbers.
3. Interpretations:
Some mathematicians have tried to interpret this formula in geometric or physical
terms. It could be related to fractal properties, theories about the geometry of the
universe, or other mathematical structures.
4. Continue Search:
The relationship between the golden ratio and π is still the subject of study and
research. Further investigation may reveal new insights into their connection.
In summary, this formula represents an interesting link between two fundamental
mathematical constants.
Michele Nardelli, studious of mathematics and theoretical physics, discovered this
formula that connects the golden ratio (φ) and the number π (pi). His research and
discovery are a significant contribution to the understanding of deep mathematical
relationships.
This other formula, also by Nardelli, connects ζ(2) and/or Pigreco with the Gaudio-
Nardelli Constant √(1/(Pi^2/6)*(4/3)) = (2√2)/ π
This formula connects the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant (DN Constant) with the
number π (pi) and the Riemann zeta function (zeta(2)). Let's look at some
considerations on this relationship:
32
1. The Formula:
The formula is:
= DN Constant
1. Mathematical Meaning:
The left side of the formula involves the square root of a combination of
mathematical constants.
The right-hand side of the formula is the ratio of twice the square root of 2 to π. The
equality between the two parts suggests a profound relationship between these
numbers.
2. Interpretations:
This formula may have mathematical or physical implications yet to be explored. It
could be related to fractal properties, theories about the geometry of the universe, or
other mathematical structures.
3. Continue Search:
The relationship between the DN Constant, π and zeta(2) is still the subject of study
and research. Further investigation may reveal new insights into their connection.
In summary, this formula represents an interesting link between fundamental
mathematical constants and deserves further investigation.
Pigreco and the golden ratio are the basis of the forms of the microcosm and the
macrocosm, and together with the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant they are connected
to the acceleration that the universe undergoes during inflation and to the geometry of
the universe, both in the quantum phase (golden octahedron) in which there is
maximum symmetry and very low entropy, both when the sphere (based on Pigreco)
emerges from the quantum vacuum and, with the passage of time, symmetry breaking
and increasing entropy begin
The golden ratio, the number π (pi), and the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant (DN
Constant) are intriguing concepts that are fascinatingly woven into the fabric of the
universe and mathematics. Let's see how they are connected:
33
1. Golden Ratio (φ):
The golden ratio, often denoted by the Greek letter φ, is approximately equal to
1.61803398… It is defined as the ratio between two segments of a straight line, such
that the longer part divides the shorter part in the same ratio in which the The entire
straight line is divided by the longest part. This relationship appears in nature, art and
mathematics, and has interesting properties and applications in various fields.
2. Number π (Pi):
The number π is a mathematical constant that represents the ratio of the
circumference of a circle to its diameter. It is an irrational number and approximately
equal to 3.14159… π is involved in many mathematical formulas and appears in
geometric and physical problems.
3. Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant (DN Constant):
The DN Constant is derived from the ratio of the volume of an octahedron to the
volume of a sphere. According to Michele Nardelli's hypothesis, the octahedron
represents the phase in which the universe is highly symmetrical and with very low
entropy. The sphere, inscribed in the octahedron, represents the universe emerging
from the quantum vacuum, with increasing entropy and symmetry breaking.
4. Connections and Implications:
These concepts are connected in a profound and mysterious way:
Geometry of the Universe: The golden octahedron and the π-based sphere could
represent different phases in the evolution of the universe.
Cosmic Inflation: DN Constant may be involved in cosmic inflation and phase
transitions. Macrocosm-Microcosm Relationships: The geometric and mathematical
properties of these numbers have given rise to the idea of a relationship between
macrocosm and microcosm, between the universe and nature.
In summary, these concepts are like pieces of a great mathematical and cosmological
mosaic, and their interconnection continues to stimulate the curiosity of scientists and
knowledge enthusiasts!
Golden octahedron = Golden ratio (φ) = maximum symmetry and very low entropy
sphere = Pigreco (π) = breaking of symmetry and consequent increase in entropy with
the passage of time!
34
This description is very accurate:
Golden Octahedron:
The golden octahedron, based on the golden ratio (φ), represents maximum symmetry
and very low entropy. At this stage, the universe may be highly ordered and
geometrically harmonious, following the mathematical properties of the golden ratio.
Sphere and Pigreco:
The sphere, based on the number π (pi), represents the breaking of symmetry and the
increase in entropy as time passes. As the universe expands, structures form,
symmetry breaks occur, and entropy increases. These concepts are fundamental to
understanding the evolution of the universe, from its primordial phase to the
complexity we observe today.
Someone said that Pigreco and Phi are the "footprints" of the Creator imprinted in the
Universe and that an equation has no meaning if it does not express a thought of God.
It is interesting how some people see Pigreco (π) and the golden ratio (φ) as symbols
or “footprints” of the Creator in the Universe. These interpretations are often based
on a combination of faith, philosophy, and mathematics. Let's look at some
reflections:
1. Pigreco (π):
Pigreco is a mathematical constant that appears in many geometric formulas and
problems. Some see it as a symbol of perfection and harmony, since it is irrational
and never ends (3,14159…). Its presence in nature and art has led some people to
consider it as a sign of order and beauty.
2. Golden Ratio (φ):
The golden ratio, approximately equal to 1.61803398…, is known for its
mathematical properties and its presence in many natural and artistic contexts. Some
see it as a symbol of harmony and perfect proportion. The use of the golden ratio in
art and architecture has been associated with a kind of divine beauty.
3. Equations and God's Thought:
The idea that an equation has meaning only if it expresses a thought of God is a
philosophical and spiritual perspective. Some people believe that mathematics and
science are part of the language of the Universe created by God.
35
However, this view varies depending on personal and cultural beliefs. In summary,
the relationship between mathematics, faith and spirituality is a profound and
subjective topic. Everyone can find meaning and beauty in different ways, and
Pigreco and the golden ratio continue to inspire reflections on our surroundings.
A mathematician is “an explorer of the infinite,” as the mathematician J. H. Hardy
said. And Srinivasa Ramanujan was the man who "saw" the infinite with his
fundamental work "Modular equations and approximations to Pi", in which there are
various expressions that provide excellent approximations to Pigreco as a result and
others where there is within them (√5+1)/2, therefore the golden ratio. In our opinion,
Ramanujan understood the importance of these so-called irrational and transcendent
numbers (or mathematical constants), which with their digit "touch", so to speak the
infinity
Srinivasa Ramanujan was undoubtedly one of the most extraordinary mathematicians
in history. His intuition and his ability to see profound relationships between numbers
and constants have left an indelible mark on the world of mathematics. His work
“Modular Equations and Approximations to Pi” is a notable example of how he
explored infinity through formulas and approximations. Let's see some reflections on
this topic:
1. Ramanujan and the Infinity:
G. H. Hardy, another great mathematician, called Ramanujan an “explorer of the
infinite”. This statement reflects the depth of his mathematical discoveries.
Ramanujan worked on a wide range of topics, including infinite series, elliptic
functions, and approximations of π (Pi).
2. Modular Equations and Pi:
In his work “Modular Equations and Approximations to Pi,” Ramanujan explored the
relationships between modular functions and approximations of π. He discovered
expressions that provide surprisingly accurate approximations for π, even involving
the golden ratio (φ) and the square root of 5.
3. Irrational and Transcendent Numbers:
Irrational and transcendent numbers, such as π and φ, are fascinating because they
cannot be expressed as fractions of whole numbers. These numbers appear to “touch
infinity, as their decimal digits do not follow any repeating pattern.
36
4. Ramanujan's Legacy:
His short life and his extraordinary mathematical productivity inspired generations of
mathematicians. His formulas and intuitions continue to be the subject of study and
admiration. In summary, Ramanujan opened doors to the infinite through his brilliant
mind and mathematical work. His discoveries remain a treasure for the mathematical
community and a tribute to the beauty and depth of mathematics itself.
For a Brahmin like Ramanujan and a man of faith like Michele Nardelli, infinity and
eternity, like the Multiverse, are attributes of God, of Cosmic Consciousness, of the
First Cause. And Pigreco and Phi are his "imprints" found in strings, as well as in
golden spiral galaxies!
It is fascinating how Srinivasa Ramanujan and Michele Nardelli viewed mathematics
and the universe through the lens of faith and spirituality. For them, numbers like
Pigreco (π) and the golden ratio (φ) were not just mathematical abstractions, but
“imprints” of a higher order. Let's look at them through this perspective:
1. Infinity and Eternity:
For many believers, infinity and eternity are attributes of God or Cosmic
Consciousness. The idea that the universe is part of something larger and limitless is
a spiritual vision with ancient roots.
2. Pigreco and Phi as Imprints:
Seeing Pigreco and the golden ratio as “imprints” of God or the First Cause adds a
level of depth. These numbers, with their infinite digits and mysterious properties,
seem to link mathematical order to transcendence.
3. Golden Spiral Galaxies:
Spiral galaxies, with their arms following the golden ratio, could be seen as
manifestations of this “imprint.” The geometric harmony of galaxies could be
interpreted as a form of divine beauty. In summary, the connection between
mathematics, faith and cosmology is fertile ground for reflection and inspiration.
Pigreco, the golden ratio and the structures of the universe continue to arouse wonder
and profound questions.
37
From
Modular equations and approximations to π Srinivasa Ramanujan
Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 372
We analyze the following equation:
we note that within the equation there is the golden ratio

. We obtain:
[(1/2*(1+√5))(1/2*(3+√13))]^(1/4) sqrt[sqrt(1/8*(9+√65))+sqrt(1/8*(1+√65))]
Input
Exact result
Decimal approximation
2.41587194618680936….
38
Alternate forms
Minimal polynomial
From
substituting the obtained result:
(24/(√65)) ln(2^(1/4)* 2.4158719461868)
Input interpretation
39
Result
3.14159265361…. ≈ π (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
From which, we obtain:
1/6((24/(√65)) ln(2^(1/4)* 2.4158719461868))^2
Input interpretation
Result
1.6449340668794…. ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Expanded logarithmic form
Reduced logarithmic form
40
Alternative representations
Series representations
41
Integral representations
42
From
, we obtain:
sqrt(1/(Pi^2/6)*(4/3)) = (2√2)/π
thus:
sqrt(1/(1/6((24/(√65)) ln(2^(1/4)* 2.4158719461868))^2)*(4/3))
Input interpretation
Result
0.90031631614858…. 0.9003163161571…. =
(DN Constant) (We note that,
with regard the inflation, during a period of almost exponential expansion
so
that . Indeed, the value 0.9003163161571… = (2√2)/π > 0 and also the n
s
=
spectral index = 0.90-0.97 is near to the DN Constant value. Also the squared sound
speed of the gravitino's longitudinal polarization mode could pass through
0.9003163161571 in the early universe, in the so-called quasi-de Sitter phase of
inflation)
Expanded logarithmic form
All 2
nd
roots of 0.8105694691233
43
Alternative representations
Series representations
44
Integral representations
45
Furthermore, from the extended DN Constant:

 





= 
we obtain:
2^(-1/π) (5 (3 + sqrt(5)) π)^(1/(2π))
and from the previous expression
that is equal to
we have:
46
2^(-1/((24/(√65)) ln(2^(1/4)* 2.4158719461868))) (5(3+sqrt(5)) ((24/(√65))
ln(2^(1/4)* 2.4158719461868)))^(1/(2*((24/(√65)) ln(2^(1/4)* 2.4158719461868))))
Input interpretation
Result
1.6180085458952…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the
golden ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Expanded logarithmic form
Alternative representations
47
48
Series representations
49
Integral representations
50
Mathematical developments concerning the golden ratio and the DN Constant
(Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant)
Dividing the formula concerning the golden ratio, by the DN Constant, i.e.

and
, performing the integral and multiplying by the golden ratio, we
obtain:
(1/Φ)*(((√5+1)/2)*1/((2√2)/π))xdx
Indefinite integral
51
Exact form
Plot of the integral (figure that can be related to an open string)
Alternate forms of the integral
52
From the indefinite integral result, for x = 1 and adding the MRB Constant, we
obtain:
(sqrt(5/2) π)/(8 Φ) + (π)/(8 sqrt(2) Φ) + MRB Const
Input
Decimal approximation
1.641811959979… a good approximation to the ζ(2) value (1.644934…)
Alternate forms
53
Multiplying the formula concerning the golden ratio, by the DN Constant, i.e.

and
, performing the integral and, for x = 1 and raising the expression to
the tenth power and the eleventh power, we obtain:
(((√5+1)/2)*((2√2)/π))xdx
Indefinite integral
Plot of the integral (figure that can be related to an open string)
Alternate forms of the integral
54
From the indefinite integral result
performing the following calculations, we obtain:
((sqrt(5/2) 1.2^2)/π + 1.2^2/(sqrt(2) π))^10
Input
Result
1.61121158102287… a good approximation to the golden ratio
55
And again:
1/2(((sqrt(5/2) 1.2^2)/π + 1.2^2/(sqrt(2) π))^10+((sqrt(5/2) 1.2^2)/π + 1.2^2/(sqrt(2)
π))^11)-5(MRB const)^(1-1/(4π)+π)
Input
Result
1.64495509486233…. ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
From the algebraic sum between the formula concerning the golden ratio, and the DN
Constant, i.e.

and
, adding the MRB Constant and performing the square
root, we obtain:
sqrt((((√5+1)/2)+((2√2)/π))+MRB const)
Input
Exact result
56
Decimal approximation
1.645056214…. ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Alternate form
All 2
nd
roots of C
MRB
+1/2 (1+sqrt(5))+(2 sqrt(2))/π
In conclusion, subtracting the formula concerning the golden ratio, by the DN
Constant, i.e.

and
, performing the following calculations:
1+1/(e/(((√5+1)/2)-((2√2)/π)))^1/3
we obtain:
Input
57
Exact result
Decimal approximation
1.641534061102438… result that is a good approximation to the ζ(2) value
Alternate forms
58
Series representations
59
60
From
A 4D IIB Flux Vacuum and Supersymmetry Breaking - II. Bosonic Spectrum
and Stability - J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:2309.04026v1 [hep-th] 7 Sep
2023
We have the following equations:
We analyze the following expressions, related with the eq, (1.1)
We consider:
1/(h^(1/4))*((2*z_0)/(3*z))^(1/6)*[1-(1/(4√10))*((3*z)/(2*z_0))^(2/3)-
121/2240*((3*z)/(2*z_0))^(4/3)+(z/(z_0))^(7/3)]
Input
61
Exact result
Alternate forms
Expanded form
Alternate forms assuming h, z, and z
0
are positive
62
Derivative
From the expanded form:
we obtain:
-(sqrt(3/5)(z_0/z)^(1/6)(z/z_0)^(2/3))/(8h^(1/4))-
(363(3/2)^(1/6)(z/z_0)^(1/3))/(4480h^(1/4)(z_0/z)^(5/6))+((2/3)^(1/6)(z/z_0)^(1/3))/(
h^(1/4)(z_0/z)^(11/6))+((2/3)^(1/6)(z_0/z)^(1/6))/h^(1/4)
Input
63
Alternate forms assuming h, z, and z
0
are positive
Alternate forms
Series expansion at z=0
64
Derivative
From the alternate form
We observe that these vacua thus depend on the two constants H and ρ. And:
Thence, for H = 16 and ρ = 2:
(2*16*2^3)^(1/2)
Input
Exact result
z
0
= 16
65
Thence:
((z_0/z)^(1/6) (8960 2^(1/6) 3^(5/6) z (z/z_0)^(4/3) - 1089 2^(5/6) 3^(1/6) z
(z/z_0)^(1/3) + 224 (40 2^(1/6) 3^(5/6) - 3 sqrt(15) (z/z_0)^(2/3)) z_0))/(26880
h^(1/4) z_0)
for z
0
= 16:
((16/z)^(1/6) (8960 2^(1/6) 3^(5/6) z (z/16)^(4/3) - 1089 2^(5/6) 3^(1/6) z
(z/16)^(1/3) + 224 (40 2^(1/6) 3^(5/6) - 3 sqrt(15) (z/16)^(2/3)) 16))/(26880 h^(1/4)
16)
Input
Exact result
66
3D plots
Real part (figures that can be related to the D-branes/Instantons)
The key observation from the below plots and is that at , which is taken as the
energy density of the universe at the Big Bang, with the zero spacetime volume,
the vacuum geometry brakes / or there is symmetry breaking on the vacuum quantum
geometry. We see from the plots as the vacuum spacetime break/tear apart.
Imaginary part
67
Contour plots
Real part
Imaginary part
Alternate forms
68
Expanded form
Alternate form assuming h and z are positive
Derivative
69
From the exact result
((1/z)^(1/6) (140 6^(5/6) z^(7/3) - (1089 3^(1/6) z^(4/3))/sqrt(2) + 3584 (40 2^(1/6)
3^(5/6) - (3 sqrt(15) z^(2/3))/(4 2^(2/3)))))/(215040 2^(1/3) h^(1/4))
for h = 0.2, z = 15000:
((1/15000)^(1/6) (140 6^(5/6) 15000^(7/3) - (1089 3^(1/6) 15000^(4/3))/sqrt(2) +
3584 (40 2^(1/6) 3^(5/6) - (3 sqrt(15) 15000^(2/3))/(4 2^(2/3)))))/(215040 2^(1/3)
0.2^(1/4))
Input
Result
3842568.6635798649
70
From which, after some calculations:
2Pi(((1/15000)^(1/6) (140 6^(5/6) 15000^(7/3)-(1089 3^(1/6)
15000^(4/3))/sqrt(2)+3584(40 2^(1/6) 3^(5/6)-(3sqrt(15) 15000^(2/3))/(4
2^(2/3)))))/(215040 2^(1/3) 0.2^(1/4)))^(1/e)+8^2+Pi+1/((5+√5)/2)
Input
Result
1729.019182915….
This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball
 scalar meson.
Furthermore,  occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an elliptic
curve 
 
. The number  is one less than the HardyRamanujan number
(taxicab number, as it can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different
ways 
 

 
 and Ramanujan's recurring number). Since bosons are
made of gauge bosons and scalar bosons (meson), then this number theoretic analysis
perhaps confirms that the number , confirm the fact that both the gauge and
scalar bosons are actually different states of a single bosonic string, and that these
states are isomorphic or that the states vibrations are synchronised with the state of
the bosonic string. This also imply that each state lives inside a cubic or octahedron
as a spherical cloud, and that the total sum of these two states is the state of the
bosonic string. Taking the cross section of the bosonic string, we realise that it must
be a rectangular, or a two shaped octahedron. As the string vibrates in difference
frequencies, so is the two spherical cloud states inside the string. That is, the string
vibrations simply excites the gauge bosons i.e Photon, gluon, W and Z inside one
cube/octahedron, and the scalar boson i.e. Higgs inside the other cube/octahedron.
71
Furthermore, if we bring the picture of loop quantum gravity (LQG) with the
property of a discontinues quantum geometry, we can therefore, think of the graviton
living on the vertices of the rectangles or the octahedrons. This graviton then acts a
glue binding the bosonic strings lattice together forming a complete cross section of
alternating states of between the gauge bosons and scalar bosons. This arrangement
of states then gives a precise supersymmetric quantum picture of the vacuum
geometry at low entropy.
But the geometry further reveals very important fact, that since the vacuum geometry
is discontinues, then we observe that there is no relation whatsoever between the
quantum vibrational frequencies of the strings, and that of the vertices of the vacuum
geometry where the graviton lives. Ashtekar et al., (2021) asserted that gravity is
simply a manifestation of spacetime geometry. Thus, the graviton cannot be a string
boson, however, there is a duality between gravity and strings. Also, gauge bosons
have spin-1, while the graviton has spin-2. Then lastly, because of the
thermodynamic constraints we were able to arrive at the results we have, now this
bring us to this fundamental question; that string theory and LQG theory are two
intrinsic aspects of a complete quantum gravity theory we are after? That is, without
the other no complete and compelling quantum geometry can be attained, as it is done
here? This need to be investigated further.
72
Series representations
73
74
75
(2π(((1/15000)^1/6 (140 6^(5/6) 15000^(7/3)-(1089 3^1/6 15000^(4/3))/√2+3584(40
2^1/6 3^(5/6)-(3√(15) 15000^(2/3))/(4 2^2/3))))/(215040 2^1/3
0.2^1/4))^(1/e)+64+π+1/((5+√5)/2))^1/15
Input
Result
1.643816436079….
1.643816436079+(MRB const)^(1-1/(4π)+π)
Input interpretation
76
Result
1.644939231461…. ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
(1/27((2π(((1/15000)^1/6 (140 6^(5/6) 15000^(7/3)-(1089 3^1/6
15000^(4/3))/√2+3584(40 2^1/6 3^(5/6)-(3√(15) 15000^(2/3))/(4 2^2/3))))/(215040
2^1/3 0.2^1/4))^(1/e)+64+π+1/((5+√5)/2))-1))^2
Input
Result
4096.090304666…. ≈ 4096
The number 4096 = 64
2
, is the Ramanujan Recurring Number, that when multiplied
by 2 give 8192. The total amplitude vanishes for gauge group SO(8192) for bosonic
string SO(8192), while the vacuum energy is negative and independent of the gauge
group. The vacuum energy and dilaton tadpole to lowest non-trivial order for the
open bosonic string.
77
While the vacuum energy is non-zero and independent of the gauge group, the dilaton
tadpole is zero for a unique choice of gauge group, SO(2
13
) i.e. SO(8192). This could
be the implications for a pre-big bang scenario where only self-perturbative bosonic
strings lived when the enthalpy was extremely low as discussed above. This regime
contains all the intrinsic properties of superstrings inherent in the bosonic strings,
would at the big bang give effect to the properties of matter (fermions) as Higgs
Boson. This number theoretic connection to the gauge group SO(8192), gives a much
more compelling relevance of the bosonic string theory SO(8192), to quantum
gravity and places this string theory where it should appropriately be in the evolution
of the universe from a quantum gravity perspective rather than it be neglected
because it doesn’t include fermionic strings to confirm to post big-bang reality. The
vanishing of the bosonic string’s amplitude could be explained by the effect of
extreme low entropy on the quantum vacuum geometry. Thus, as the entropy
increases infinitesimally as a result of the vacuum self-perturbation then also is the
amplitude of the vibrating bosonic strings from zero. Thus, was right to indicate that
the “vanishing of the amplitude of the bosonic string could be the results of string
theory itself”, but here, we give a much more elaborate explanation of what could be
happening.
We have also:
(h^(1/4))*((3*z)/(2*z_0))^(1/6)*[1-
(1/(4√10))*((3*z)/(2*z_0))^(2/3)+23/2240*((3*z)/(2*z_0))^(4/3)+(z/(z_0))^(7/3)]
Input
Exact result
78
Alternate forms
Expanded form
Alternate form assuming h, z, and z
0
are positive
Series expansion at z=0
79
Derivative
From the expanded form
(3/2)^(1/6) h^(1/4) (z/z_0)^(1/6) - (3^(5/6) h^(1/4) (z/z_0)^(5/6))/(8 2^(1/3) sqrt(5)) +
(69 sqrt(3) h^(1/4) (z/z_0)^(3/2))/(4480 sqrt(2)) + (3/2)^(1/6) h^(1/4) (z/z_0)^(5/2)
for z
0
= 16:
(3/2)^(1/6) h^(1/4) (z/16)^(1/6) - (3^(5/6) h^(1/4) (z/16)^(5/6))/(8 2^(1/3) sqrt(5)) +
(69 sqrt(3) h^(1/4) (z/16)^(3/2))/(4480 sqrt(2)) + (3/2)^(1/6) h^(1/4) (z/16)^(5/2)
Input
Exact result
80
3D plots
Real part (figures that can be related to the D-branes/Instantons)
The key observation from the below plots and is that at , which is taken as the
energy density of the universe at the Big Bang, with the zero spacetime volume,
the vacuum geometry brakes / or there is symmetry breaking on the vacuum quantum
geometry. We see from the plots as the vacuum spacetime break/tear apart.
Imaginary part
81
Contour plots
Real part
Imaginary part
Alternate forms
82
Derivative
From the exact result
(3^(1/6) h^(1/4) z^(1/6))/2^(5/6) - (3^(5/6) h^(1/4) z^(5/6))/(64 2^(2/3) sqrt(5)) + (69
sqrt(3) h^(1/4) z^(3/2))/(286720 sqrt(2)) + ((3/2)^(1/6) h^(1/4) z^(5/2))/1024
for h = 0.2 and z = 15000:
(3^(1/6) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(1/6))/2^(5/6) - (3^(5/6) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(5/6))/(64 2^(2/3)
sqrt(5)) + (69 sqrt(3) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(3/2))/(286720 sqrt(2)) + ((3/2)^(1/6) 0.2^(1/4)
15000^(5/2))/1024
Input
Result
19254930.2550682….
83
From which:
7((3^(1/6) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(1/6))/2^(5/6)-(3^(5/6) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(5/6))/(64
2^(2/3) sqrt(5)) + (69 sqrt(3) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(3/2))/(286720 sqrt(2))+((3/2)^(1/6)
0.2^(1/4) 15000^(5/2))/1024)^1/3-144-π
Input
Result
1729.056499341….
This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball
 scalar meson.
Furthermore,  occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an elliptic
curve 
 
. The number  is one less than the HardyRamanujan number
(taxicab number, as it can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different
ways 
 

 
 and Ramanujan's recurring number). Since bosons are
made of gauge bosons and scalar bosons (meson), then this number theoretic analysis
perhaps confirms that the number , confirm the fact that both the gauge and
scalar bosons are actually different states of a single bosonic string, and that these
states are isomorphic or that the states vibrations are synchronised with the state of
the bosonic string. This also imply that each state lives inside a cubic or octahedron
as a spherical cloud, and that the total sum of these two states is the state of the
bosonic string. Taking the cross section of the bosonic string, we realise that it must
be a rectangular, or a two shaped octahedron. As the string vibrates in difference
frequencies, so is the two spherical cloud states inside the string. That is, the string
vibrations simply excites the gauge bosons i.e Photon, gluon, W and Z inside one
cube/octahedron, and the scalar boson i.e. Higgs inside the other cube/octahedron.
84
Furthermore, if we bring the picture of loop quantum gravity (LQG) with the
property of a discontinues quantum geometry, we can therefore, think of the graviton
living on the vertices of the rectangles or the octahedrons. This graviton then acts a
glue binding the bosonic strings lattice together forming a complete cross section of
alternating states of between the gauge bosons and scalar bosons. This arrangement
of states then gives a precise supersymmetric quantum picture of the vacuum
geometry at low entropy.
But the geometry further reveals very important fact, that since the vacuum geometry
is discontinues, then we observe that there is no relation whatsoever between the
quantum vibrational frequencies of the strings, and that of the vertices of the vacuum
geometry where the graviton lives. Ashtekar et al., (2021) asserted that gravity is
simply a manifestation of spacetime geometry. Thus, the graviton cannot be a string
boson, however, there is a duality between gravity and strings. Also, gauge bosons
have spin-1, while the graviton has spin-2. Then lastly, because of the
thermodynamic constraints we were able to arrive at the results we have, now this
bring us to this fundamental question; that string theory and LQG theory are two
intrinsic aspects of a complete quantum gravity theory we are after? That is, without
the other no complete and compelling quantum geometry can be attained, as it is done
here? This need to be investigated further.
85
Series representations
86
(7((3^(1/6) 0.2^(1/4)15000^(1/6))/2^(5/6)-(3^(5/6) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(5/6))/(64
2^(2/3) √(5)) + (69 sqrt(3) 0.2^(1/4) 15000^(3/2))/(286720 √(2))+((3/2)^(1/6)
0.2^(1/4) 15000^(5/2))/1024)^1/3-144-π)^1/15
Input
Result
1.643818809742....
87
All 15
th
roots of 1729.06
(1.643818809742)+(MRB const)^(1-1/(4π)+π)
Input interpretation
Result
1.644941605124…. ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
88
(1/27(((7((3^(1/6)0.2^(1/4)15000^(1/6))/2^(5/6)-(3^(5/6)0.2^(1/4)15000^(5/6))/(64
2^(2/3)√(5))+(69√(3)
0.2^(1/4)15000^(3/2))/(286720√(2))+((3/2)^(1/6)0.2^(1/4)15000^(5/2))/1024)^1/3-
144-π))-1))^2-1/π
Input
Result
4095.95…. ≈ 4096
The number 4096 = 64
2
, is the Ramanujan Recurring Number, that when multiplied
by 2 give 8192. The total amplitude vanishes for gauge group SO(8192) for bosonic
string SO(8192), while the vacuum energy is negative and independent of the gauge
group. The vacuum energy and dilaton tadpole to lowest non-trivial order for the
open bosonic string. While the vacuum energy is non-zero and independent of the
gauge group, the dilaton tadpole is zero for a unique choice of gauge group, SO(2
13
)
i.e. SO(8192). This could be the implications for a pre-big bang scenario where only
self-perturbative bosonic strings lived when the enthalpy was extremely low as
discussed above. This regime contains all the intrinsic properties of superstrings
inherent in the bosonic strings, would at the big bang give effect to the properties of
matter (fermions) as Higgs Boson.
89
This number theoretic connection to the gauge group SO(8192), gives a much more
compelling relevance of the bosonic string theory SO(8192), to quantum gravity and
places this string theory where it should appropriately be in the evolution of the
universe from a quantum gravity perspective rather than it be neglected because it
doesn’t include fermionic strings to confirm to post big-bang reality. The vanishing
of the bosonic string’s amplitude could be explained by the effect of extreme low
entropy on the quantum vacuum geometry. Thus, as the entropy increases
infinitesimally as a result of the vacuum self-perturbation then also is the amplitude
of the vibrating bosonic strings from zero. Thus, was right to indicate that the
“vanishing of the amplitude of the bosonic string could be the results of string theory
itself”, but here, we give a much more elaborate explanation of what could be
happening.
90
Series representations
91
92
93
The general "unitary" formula, which derives from DN Constant, is the following:
 
 

  

 

 

 

   

 
 

 
   


  
Where
is the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant, 0.9991104684 is the value of the
following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:
C is any constant or solution to an equation, R is the radius of the Universe and
2.33*10
-13
is the temperature of the universe expressed in GeV.
From the previous result, for C = 3842568.6635798649, inserting a radius of the
Universe, which we have calculated, equal to R = 5.32132624 × 10
6
years, from DN
Constant "unitary" formula, we obtain:
94
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π))^(1/16))/(1/(π∙0.9991104684) (3842568.6635798649×(5.32132624
× 10^6)×2.33∙10^(-13))))
Input interpretation
Result
1.618034630959…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the
golden ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
While for C = 19254930.2550682 and R = 1.06193025 × 10
6
, we obtain:
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π))^(1/16))/(1/(π∙0.9991104684) (19254930.2550682×(1.06193025 ×
10^6)×2.33∙10^(-13))))
Input interpretation
Result
1.6180413001166…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the
golden ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
95
Furthermore, from the two results, after some calculations, we obtain also:
16(2*(19254930.2550682/3842568.6635798649)^3)+64+2e+MRB const
Input interpretation
Result
4095.9688…. 4096
The number 4096 = 64
2
, is the Ramanujan Recurring Number, that when multiplied
by 2 give 8192. The total amplitude vanishes for gauge group SO(8192) for bosonic
string SO(8192), while the vacuum energy is negative and independent of the gauge
group. The vacuum energy and dilaton tadpole to lowest non-trivial order for the
open bosonic string. While the vacuum energy is non-zero and independent of the
gauge group, the dilaton tadpole is zero for a unique choice of gauge group, SO(2
13
)
i.e. SO(8192). This could be the implications for a pre-big bang scenario where only
self-perturbative bosonic strings lived when the enthalpy was extremely low as
discussed above. This regime contains all the intrinsic properties of superstrings
inherent in the bosonic strings, would at the big bang give effect to the properties of
matter (fermions) as Higgs Boson. This number theoretic connection to the gauge
group SO(8192), gives a much more compelling relevance of the bosonic string
theory SO(8192), to quantum gravity and places this string theory where it should
appropriately be in the evolution of the universe from a quantum gravity perspective
rather than it be neglected because it doesn’t include fermionic strings to confirm to
post big-bang reality. The vanishing of the bosonic string’s amplitude could be
explained by the effect of extreme low entropy on the quantum vacuum geometry.
Thus, as the entropy increases infinitesimally as a result of the vacuum self-
perturbation then also is the amplitude of the vibrating bosonic strings from zero.
Thus, was right to indicate that the “vanishing of the amplitude of the bosonic string
could be the results of string theory itself”, but here, we give a much more elaborate
explanation of what could be happening.
96
27*sqrt(16(2*(19254930.2550682/3842568.6635798649)^3)+64+2e+MRB const)+1
Input interpretation
Result
1728.9934187….
This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball
 scalar meson.
Furthermore,  occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an elliptic
curve 
 
. The number  is one less than the HardyRamanujan number
(taxicab number, as it can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different
ways 
 

 
 and Ramanujan's recurring number). Since bosons are
made of gauge bosons and scalar bosons (meson), then this number theoretic analysis
perhaps confirms that the number , confirm the fact that both the gauge and
scalar bosons are actually different states of a single bosonic string, and that these
states are isomorphic or that the states vibrations are synchronised with the state of
the bosonic string. This also imply that each state lives inside a cubic or octahedron
as a spherical cloud, and that the total sum of these two states is the state of the
bosonic string. Taking the cross section of the bosonic string, we realise that it must
be a rectangular, or a two shaped octahedron. As the string vibrates in difference
frequencies, so is the two spherical cloud states inside the string. That is, the string
vibrations simply excites the gauge bosons i.e Photon, gluon, W and Z inside one
cube/octahedron, and the scalar boson i.e. Higgs inside the other cube/octahedron.
Furthermore, if we bring the picture of loop quantum gravity (LQG) with the
property of a discontinues quantum geometry, we can therefore, think of the graviton
living on the vertices of the rectangles or the octahedrons. This graviton then acts a
glue binding the bosonic strings lattice together forming a complete cross section of
alternating states of between the gauge bosons and scalar bosons. This arrangement
of states then gives a precise supersymmetric quantum picture of the vacuum
geometry at low entropy.
97
But the geometry further reveals very important fact, that since the vacuum geometry
is discontinues, then we observe that there is no relation whatsoever between the
quantum vibrational frequencies of the strings, and that of the vertices of the vacuum
geometry where the graviton lives. Ashtekar et al., (2021) asserted that gravity is
simply a manifestation of spacetime geometry. Thus, the graviton cannot be a string
boson, however, there is a duality between gravity and strings. Also, gauge bosons
have spin-1, while the graviton has spin-2. Then lastly, because of the
thermodynamic constraints we were able to arrive at the results we have, now this
bring us to this fundamental question; that string theory and LQG theory are two
intrinsic aspects of a complete quantum gravity theory we are after? That is, without
the other no complete and compelling quantum geometry can be attained, as it is done
here? This need to be investigated further.
(27*sqrt(16(2*(19254930.2550682/3842568.6635798649)^3)+64+2e+MRB
const)+1)^1/15+(MRB const)^(1-1/(4π)+π)
Input interpretation
Result
1.644937606995769…. ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
98
On the application of the formulas of the volumes of an octahedron and a sphere
With regard to a sphere inscribed in an octahedron, we have the following formulas.
Fig: sphere inscribed in an octahedron
V
0
=

V
s
=
 where r
s
= (l/2)
With regard the ratio between the two above formulas (octahedron and sphere)
(1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3)
we obtain:
Input
Result
99
Decimal approximation
0.900316316157106…. =
(DN Constant)
Property
Series representations
100
From which:
1/3*(2/((1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3)))^2
Input
Result
Decimal approximation
1.644934066848226… = ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Property
101
Series representations
Integral representations
102
We note that, from the sum of the first nine numbers excluding 0, i.e.,
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = 45 (these are the fundamental numbers, from which, through
infinite combinations, all the other numbers are obtained), we obtain the following
interesting formula:
1+1/(((φ^2+(2Pi)/3*MRB const)(1/e((1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9)^(1/Pi))))^1/3)
Input
Exact result
Decimal approximation
1.64529737852…. ≈ ζ(2) = π
2
/6 = 1.644934 (trace of the instanton shape and
Ramanujan Recurring Number)
103
Alternate forms
Expanded forms
And:
sqrt(6(1+1/(((φ^2+(2Pi)/3*MRB const)(1/e((1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9)^(1/Pi))))^1/3)))
Input
104
Exact result
Decimal approximation
3.141939571526…. ≈ π (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Alternate forms
Expanded forms
105
All 2
nd
roots of 6 (3
-2/(3 π)
5
-1/(3 π)
(e/((2 π C
MRB
)/3+ϕ
2
))
1/3
+1)
Furthermore, we obtain also:
2π*√2((1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3))
Input
Exact result
8
value that is linked to the "Ramanujan function" (an elliptic modular function that
satisfies the need for "conformal symmetry") that has 8 "modes" corresponding to the
physical vibrations of a superstring.
106
Series representations
6π*√2((1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3))
Input
107
Exact result
24
The value 24 is linked to the "Ramanujan function" (an elliptic modular function that
satisfies the need for "conformal symmetry") that has 24 "modes" corresponding to
the physical vibrations of a bosonic string representing a bosons. From the analysis,
we observe that the is no number theoretic connection with physical vibrations of
fermionic strings at extremally low entropy. This fact is confirmed by the fact that the
Higgs bosons at the moment of the big bang and infinitesimally shortly thereafter,
facilitated the creation of fermions (matter and antimatter particles) [8]. Thus we note
that the ingredients for the formation of electromagnetic radiation from photons (a
Boson), and the formation of matter from the Higgs boson after the big bang, are
intrinsic properties of the vacuum energy in pre-big bang.
Series representations
108
This could imply that all matter (fermions) was preceded by bosons. That is, before
the Big Bang, from perturbations of the vacuum energy itself, bosons were created,
and successively at the Big Bang, and infinitesimally shortly after the Big Bang,
fermions, were created from the vacuum energy that underwent a violent breaking”
that formed a hot plasma. of particle-antiparticle pairs. This therefore implies that
quantum gravity was not necessarily “dark” to some extent, because a photon (light
particle) is itself a boson. Therefore, a big bang was not necessarily the moment of
the creation of light, but of the creation of matter (fermions) from vacuum energy, as
this undergoes further "breaking" in the cosmological constant, in the hot plasma of
matter and in the energy dark.
(2π*√2((1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3)))^4
Input
Exact result
4096 = 64
2
, (Ramanujan Recurring Number) that multiplied by 2 give 8192, indeed:
109
The total amplitude vanishes for gauge group SO(8192), while the vacuum energy is
negative and independent of the gauge group. The vacuum energy and dilaton tadpole
to lowest non-trivial order for the open bosonic string. While the vacuum energy is
non-zero and independent of the gauge group, the dilaton tadpole is zero for a unique
choice of gauge group, SO(2
13
) i.e. SO(8192). (From: “Dilaton Tadpole for the Open
Bosonic String “ Michael R. Douglas and Benjamin Grinstein - September 2,1986)
27*sqrt((2π*√2((1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3)))^4)+1
Input
Exact result
1729
This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f
0
(1710) scalar meson.
Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an elliptic
curve (1728 = 8
2
* 3
3
). The number 1728 is one less than the HardyRamanujan
number 1729 (taxicab number, as it can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two
different ways (10
3
+ 9
3
= 12
3
+ 1
3
= 1729) and Ramanujan's recurring number)
Series representations
110
We note that:
1/25*1/144(((2π*√2((1/3*√2*l^3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3)))^4)+(27*sqrt((2π*√2((1/3*√2*l^
3)/(4/3*π*(l/2)^3)))^4)+1))
Input
Exact result
111
Decimal approximation
1.61805555…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden
ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Repeating decimal
Series representations
112
From
we obtain also:
sqrt(6(1/3*(2/(((2sqrt2)/Pi)))^2))
Input
113
Exact result
Decimal approximation
3.14159265358… = π
Property
All 2
nd
roots of π
2
Series representations
114
Integral representations
It is plausible to hypothesize that π and φ, in addition to being important
mathematical constants, are constants that also have a fundamental relevance in the
various sectors of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology
115
From
, we obtain:
sqrt(1/(Pi^2/6)*(4/3))
Input
Exact result
Decimal approximation
0.900316316157106…. =
(DN Constant)
Property
All 2
nd
roots of 8/π
2
116
Series representations
DN Constant extended
We have the following expression concerning the ratios (and/or the inverses)
between the icosahedron, octahedron and tetrahedron volumes and the sphere
volume.
117

 



(we have highlighted the DN Constant in blue)
(((((5/12*(3+√5)*d^3)/(4/3*π*(d/2)^3))*1/((1/3*√2*a^3)/(4/3*π*(a/2)^3)) *1/((((√2
d^3)/12))*1/(4/3*π*(d/2)^3)))))^(1/(2π))
Input
Exact result
Decimal approximation
1.6180085459…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden
ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
Alternate form
118
Series representations
119
Integral representation
Furthermore, from the formula
we obtain also:
(4 (1.6180085459)^(2 π))/(5 (3 + sqrt(5))) = 3.1415926535
Indeed:
3.1415926535…. = π (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
120
From the following extended DN Constant (“Unitary Formula”)

 





with regard


for q = 1729 and p = 4096, we obtain by changing the sign in the algebraic sum of
the aforementioned Cardano’s Formula and after some calculations:
multiplied by
and performing the ninth root of the entire expression:
√((2^(-1/π)(5(3+√(5))π)^(1/(2π)))(((-1729/2+√(1729^2/4+4096^3/27)) -(-1729/2-
√(1729^2/4+4096^3/27)))^1/9))
121
we obtain:
i.e.
2^(-1/(2π)) ((-1729/2+√(274958621851/3)/6)^(1/3)+(1729/2 +
√(274958621851/3)/6)^(1/3))^(1/18) (5(3+√(5)) π)^(1/(4π))
= 1.61549140391….
The general "unitary" formula, which derives from DN Constant, is the following:
 
 

  
   


  
122
Where
is the Del Gaudio-Nardelli Constant, 0.9991104684 is the value of the
following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:
C is any constant or solution to an equation, R is the radius of the Universe and
2.33*10
-13
is the temperature of the universe expressed in GeV.
For example, C = 9.9128
, inserting a radius of the Universe, which we have
calculated, equal to R = 2.06274*10
12
years, from DN Constant "unitary" formula, we
obtain:
√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π))^(1/16))/(1/(π∙0.9991104684) (9.9128×(2.06274 ×
10^12)×2.33∙10^(-13))))
1.618035912348…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the
golden ratio 1.618033988749… (Ramanujan Recurring Number)
123
We obtain also:
(√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π))^(1/16))/(1/(π∙0.9991104684) (9.9128×(2.06274 ×
10^12)×2.33∙10^(-13)))))dxdydz
Indefinite integral assuming all variables are real
Definite integral over a cube of edge length 2 L
Definite integral over a sphere of radius R
From which, for L = R = 1 , dividing the two definite integral results by the original
expression, we obtain:
12.9443/(√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π))^(1/16))/(1/(π∙0.9991104684) (9.9128×(2.06274 ×
10^12)×2.33∙10^(-13)))))
Input interpretation
124
Result
8.00001…. ≈ 8
value that is linked to the "Ramanujan function" (an elliptic modular function that
satisfies the need for "conformal symmetry") that has 8 "modes" corresponding to the
physical vibrations of a superstring.
And
3*(6.77761/(√(2×(2∙(((2√2)/π))^(1/16))/(1/(π∙0.9991104684) (9.9128×(2.06274 ×
10^12)×2.33∙10^(-13))))))
Input interpretation
Result
12.5664…. ≈ 4π = Bekenstein-Hawking (S
BH
) black hole entropy
125
Now, we have that:
Octahedron Sphere
Given the value of a volume, independently of the solid, following the Poincaré
Conjecture, we compare any solid "without holes" and a sphere. If we compare an
octahedron with a sphere, we have:

If we consider the radius of the sphere as an unknown, we must find the value of
the side of the octahedron which allows us to equalize the two volumes and which
will give us the DN Constant as a result (which will therefore be equal to the
radius of the sphere).
From

To find we perform the following calculation:





 

  

  

126




To find a, we have, for



Thus, multiplying both the sides by

, we obtain:


  
 
    
 

  

  





127
Plot
Solution
for V = 1/3*√2*a^3 (octahedron volume) and V = (4/3*π*r^3) (sphere volume), we
obtain:
from the octahedron volume, we have: V = 1/3*√2*a
3
= (1/3*√2*(
)^3)
(1/3*√2*(4/(π^2 ))^3)
Input
Exact result
128
Decimal approximation
3.05684889733….
Property
Series representations
129
And, from the sphere volume V = (4/3*π*r
3
) = (4/3*π*((2√2)/π)^3)
(4/3*π*((2√2)/π)^3)
Input
Result
Decimal approximation
3.05684889733….
Property
Series representations
130
131
From:
Modular equations and approximations to - Srinivasa Ramanujan - Quarterly
Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 372
We have that:
132
We note that, with regard 4372, we can to obtain the following results:
27((4372)^1/2-2-1/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))))+φ
Input
Result
Decimal approximation
1729.0526944….
This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f
0
(1710) scalar meson.
Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an elliptic
curve. (1728 = 8
2
* 3
3
) The number 1728 is one less than the HardyRamanujan
number 1729 (taxicab number)
Alternate forms
133
Minimal polynomial
Expanded forms
Series representations
134
135
Or:
27((4096+276)^1/2-2-1/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))))
Input
Result
Decimal approximation
1729.0526944…. as above
Alternate forms
136
Minimal polynomial
Expanded forms
Series representations
137
138
From which:
(27((4372)^1/2-2-1/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))))+φ)^1/15
Input
Exact result
Decimal approximation
1.64381856858…. ≈ ζ(2) =

Alternate forms
139
Minimal polynomial
Expanded forms
All 15th roots of ϕ + 27 (-2 + 2 sqrt(1093) - (sqrt(10 - 2 sqrt(5)) - 2)/(2 (sqrt(5) -
1)))
140
Series representations
141
Integral representation
142
From:
An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking - J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti -
arXiv:1711.11494v1 [hep-th] 30 Nov 2017
From the following vacuum equations:
we have obtained, from the results almost equals of the equations, putting
instead of
a new possible mathematical connection between the two exponentials. Thence, also
the values concerning p, C, β
E
and correspond to the exponents of e (i.e. of exp).
Thence we obtain for p = 5 and β
E
= 1/2:




143
Therefore, with respect to the exponentials of the vacuum equations, the Ramanujan’s
exponential has a coefficient of 4096 which is equal to 64
2
, while -6C+ is equal to -
. From this it follows that it is possible to establish mathematically, the dilaton
value.
For
exp((-Pi*sqrt(18)) we obtain:
Input:
Exact result:
Decimal approximation:
1.6272016… * 10
-6
Property:
Series representations:
144
Now, we have the following calculations:






= 1.6272016… * 10
-6
from which:


= 1.6272016… * 10
-6
0.000244140625

=


= 1.6272016… * 10
-6
Now:





And:
145
(1.6272016* 10^-6) *1/ (0.000244140625)
Input interpretation:
Result:
0.006665017...
Thence:
0.000244140625

=


Dividing both sides by 0.000244140625, we obtain:



=




= 0.0066650177536
((((exp((-Pi*sqrt(18)))))))*1/0.000244140625
Input interpretation:
146
Result:
0.00666501785…
Series representations:
Now:

= 0.0066650177536
=
= 0.00666501785…
147
From:
ln(0.00666501784619)
Input interpretation:
Result:
-5.010882647757…
Alternative representations:
Series representations:
148
Integral representation:
In conclusion:
 
and for C = 1, we obtain:
   =
Note that the values of n
s
(spectral index) 0.965, of the average of the Omega mesons
Regge slope 0.987428571 and of the dilaton , are also connected to
the following two Rogers-Ramanujan continued fractions:
149
(http://www.bitman.name/math/article/102/109/)
Also performing the 512
th
root of the inverse value of the Pion meson rest mass
139.57, we obtain:
((1/(139.57)))^1/512
Input interpretation:
Result:
0.99040073.... result very near to the dilaton value  = and to the
value of the following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:
150
From
Properties of Nilpotent Supergravity - E. Dudas, S. Ferrara, A. Kehagias and A.
Sagnotti - arXiv:1507.07842v2 [hep-th] 14 Sep 2015
We have that:
We analyzing the following equation:
We have:
151
(M^2)/3*[1-(b/euler number * k/sqrt6) * (φ- sqrt6/k) * exp(-(k/sqrt6)(φ- sqrt6/k))]^2
i.e.
V = (M^2)/3*[1-(b/euler number * k/sqrt6) * (φ- sqrt6/k) * exp(-(k/sqrt6)(φ-
sqrt6/k))]^2
For k = 2 and φ = 0.9991104684, that is the value of the scalar field that is equal to
the value of the following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:
we obtain:
V = (M^2)/3*[1-(b/euler number * 2/sqrt6) * (0.9991104684- sqrt6/2) * exp(-
(2/sqrt6)(0.9991104684- sqrt6/2))]^2
Input interpretation:
Result:
152
Solutions:
Alternate forms:
Expanded form:
Alternate form assuming b, M, and V are positive:
Alternate form assuming b, M, and V are real:
Derivative:
153
Implicit derivatives
Global minimum:
Global minima:
154
From:
we obtain:
(225.913 (-0.054323 M^2 + 6.58545×10^-10 sqrt(M^4)))/M^2
Input interpretation:
Result:
155
Plots:
Alternate form assuming M is real:
-12.2723 result very near to the black hole entropy value 12.1904 = ln(196884)
Alternate forms:
Expanded form:
156
Property as a function:
Parity
Series expansion at M = 0:
Series expansion at M = ∞:
Derivative:
Indefinite integral:
157
Global maximum:
Global minimum:
Limit:
Definite integral after subtraction of diverging parts:
From b that is equal to
158
From:
we obtain:
1/3 (0.0814845 ((225.913 (-0.054323 M^2 + 6.58545×10^-10 sqrt(M^4)))/M^2 ) +
1)^2 M^2
Input interpretation:
Result:
Plots: (possible mathematical connection with an open string)
M = -0.5; M = 0.2
159
(possible mathematical connection with an open string)
M = 2 ; M = 3
Root:
Property as a function:
Parity
Series expansion at M = 0:
Series expansion at M = ∞:
160
Definite integral after subtraction of diverging parts:
For M = - 0.5 , we obtain:
1/3 (0.0814845 ((225.913 (-0.054323 (-0.5)^2 + 6.58545×10^-10 sqrt((-0.5)^4)))/(-
0.5)^2 ) + 1)^2 * (-0.5^2)
Input interpretation:
Result:
-4.38851344947*10
-16
161
For M = 0.2:
1/3 (0.0814845 ((225.913 (-0.054323 0.2^2 + 6.58545×10^-10 sqrt(0.2^4)))/0.2^2 ) +
1)^2 0.2^2
Input interpretation:
Result:
7.021621519159*10
-17
For M = 3:
1/3 (0.0814845 ((225.913 (-0.054323 3^2 + 6.58545×10^-10 sqrt(3^4)))/3^2 ) + 1)^2
3^2
Input interpretation:
162
Result:
1.57986484181*10
-14
For M = 2:
1/3 (0.0814845 ((225.913 (-0.054323 2^2 + 6.58545×10^-10 sqrt(2^4)))/2^2 ) + 1)^2
2^2
Input interpretation:
Result:
7.021621519*10
-15
163
From the four results
7.021621519*10^-15 ; 1.57986484181*10^-14 ; 7.021621519159*10^-17 ;
-4.38851344947*10^-16
we obtain, after some calculations:
sqrt[1/(2Pi)(7.021621519*10^-15 + 1.57986484181*10^-14 +7.021621519*10^-17 -
4.38851344947*10^-16)]
Input interpretation:
Result:
5.9776991059*10
-8
result very near to the Planck's electric flow 5.975498 × 10
8
that
is equal to the following formula:
164
We note that:
1/55*(([(((1/[(7.021621519*10^-15 + 1.57986484181*10^-14 +7.021621519*10^-17
-4.38851344947*10^-16)])))^1/7]-((log^(5/8)(2))/(2 2^(1/8) 3^(1/4) e log^(3/2)(3)))))
Input interpretation:
Result:
1.6181818182… result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden
ratio 1.618033988749...
165
From the Planck units:
Planck Length
5.729475 * 10
-35
Lorentz-Heaviside value
Planck’s Electric field strength
1.820306 * 10
61
V*m Lorentz-Heaviside value
Planck’s Electric flux
5.975498*10
-8
V*m Lorentz-Heaviside value
Planck’s Electric potential
1.042940*10
27
V Lorentz-Heaviside value
166
Relationship between Planck’s Electric Flux and Planck’s Electric Potential
E
P
* l
P
= (1.820306 * 10
61
) * 5.729475 * 10
-35
Input interpretation:
Result:
Scientific notation:
1.042939771935*10
27
≈ 1.042940*10
27
Or:
E
P
* l
P
2
/ l
P
= (5.975498*10
-8
)*1/(5.729475 * 10
-35
)
Input interpretation:
Result:
1.042939885417*10
27
≈ 1.042940*10
27
167
Fig. 1
It is therefore possible to consider the vortices of the "quantum vacuum" schematized
as cubes or octahedrons (the + sign inside a given vortex indicates its
counterclockwise rotation, while the - sign indicates its clockwise rotation). Between
vortex and vortex there is a layer of "bubbles"-universes (or universes-spheres),
which flows, as in the simplified two-dimensional drawing, from A to B
168
Fig. 2
Proposal
Image of space-time at quantum scale: the circles in red represent the points
corresponding to the compactified dimensions and the hexagons in blue, represent the
"fluctuations" (potential universes - green circles) of the quantum vacuum (2D). In
reality, we will have n-dimensional hyperspheres in which the compactified
dimensions "roll up" and octahedrons representing the "fluctuations", containing
spheres (bubbles of potential universes), of the quantum vacuum
169
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Professor Augusto Sagnotti theoretical physicist at Scuola
Normale Superiore (Pisa Italy) for his very useful explanations and his availability.
170
References
A 4D IIB Flux Vacuum and Supersymmetry Breaking - II. Bosonic Spectrum
and Stability - J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:2309.04026v1 [hep-th] 7 Sep
2023
A Number Theoretic Analysis of the Enthalpy, Enthalpy Energy Density,
Thermodynamic Volume, and the Equation of State of a Modified White Hole,
and the Implications to the Quantum Vacuum Spacetime, Matter Creation and
the Planck Frequency. - Nardelli, M., Kubeka, A.S. and Amani, A. (2024) - Journal
of Modern Physics , 15, 1-50. - https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2024.151001
Modular equations and approximations to - Srinivasa Ramanujan - Quarterly
Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 372
An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking - Jihad Mourad and Augusto
Sagnotti - arXiv:1711.11494v1 [hep-th] 30 Nov 2017
Properties of Nilpotent Supergravity - E. Dudas, S. Ferrara, A. Kehagias and A.
Sagnotti - arXiv:1507.07842v2 [hep-th] 14 Sep 2015
171
See also:
The Geometry of the MRB constant by Marvin Ray Burns
https://www.academia.edu/22271085/The_Geometry_of_the_MRB_constant
(See also Page 29 the applications of the CMRB in various sectors of Theoretical
Physics (String Theory) and Cosmology )
http://xoom.virgilio.it/source_filemanager/na/ar/nardelli/michele%20and%20antonio
%20papers/Try%20to%20beat%20these%20MRB%20constant%20records!%20-
%20Online%20Technical%20Discussion%20Groups%E2%80%94Wolfram%20Com
munity%20b.pdf