This proof provides a formula that, based on the assumptions stated, yields two prime numbers that sum to
a given even number n. If this formula holds true for all even numbers, it supports the validity of the
Goldbach Conjecture.
10. :
- This proof contributes to the ongoing quest to validate the Goldbach Conjecture, which holds historical
and mathematical significance.
- Limitations include the need for further validation, potential refinements, and an expanded range of tested
numbers.
- The potential impact of this work on the field of number theory and mathematics should be considered.
- The formula has a potential to generate two prime numbers for even number,which when added gives the
even number.This formula thus can help prove goldbach conjecture if large quantity numbers are checked
for the correctness of the formula which also leaves us with a way to generate two prime numbers in
context of a given even number.
11. :
A new formula have been discovered for proving the goldbach conjecture(beacause it gives two prime
numbers for a even number):(n÷2)±1,2,3[n=a even number][if n÷2 results in a number between 1 to 100
including 1 and 100 then it is ±1,2,3 and if n÷2 is between 101 to 200 including 1 and 200 then it should be
±4,5,6 and so on the numbers will change according to the set of 100 numbers to which it belongs to](like 1
to 100 with 1 and 100:±1,2,3)(101 to 200 with 101 and 200:±4,5,6)and so on.
This a formula for proving goldbach conjecture for a number n(where n is even number).And if n÷2 is odd
number then you have to choose even number from the three numbers for every set of 100 numbers like
from ±1,2,3 you choose ±2 for further evaluation and the opposite if n÷2 is even number.This formula is
original.This formula proves golbach conjecture as it will always generate the two prime numbers which will
add up to the given even number.
Cases like 1212:1212÷2=606
=606±19,±21[result for ±21 are similiar like ±19]
=606+19=625(wrong),606-19=587(it is prime number but 1212-587=625[not a prime]
so you do ±16,±18[beacause 587 falled in the by the ± process and if it happens like this anytime then you
have to ±x number from which is assigned for the specific range in which it falls][basically after dividing and
after that subtracting or adding the values assigned for the range in which n÷2 falls and if the final answer
falls in other range due to the addition or subtraction of values from the answer of n÷2 and the values of the
range of 100 numbers is specified then the final answer should again go through the ± process but the
values are of the new range in which the final answer falls]Now do n-final answer=the other prime number.
:
Proof for goldbach conjecture by Chaitanya Bankar is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International
Proof for goldbach conjecture © 2023 by Chaitanya Bankar is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial
4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/