the Tao that is named is not the formless Tao
self containing, recursive. both virus and host at once. imitating ...
I'm a little confused here-
Does this describe an infinitely recur...
This should be ||CD|| as the vector part of this math was also show...
MACHINE
Γ
j
(n)∶=Γ
j
n;
M(1), ..., M(n)
m(1), ..., m(n)
, M(k)∶=max(x
k
(Γ
l
n
)); m(k)∶=min(x
k
(Γ
l
n
));
lim
n→∞
Γ
j
(n)∶=Γ
j
ψ(n)<Γ
2k
n
Γ
l
n+1
<Γ
2k
n
Γ
l+1
n+1
<Γ
2k
n
Γ
2k−1
n+1
; l, k ∈ Z
+
≥1
, n ∈
Z
+
≥0
-ψ(n)=
ϕ , n =0
∣Γ
2k
n
Γ
2k+1
n
∣
10
, n >0
to know god is not to know god.
Γ
k
n
Γ
k+1
n
∶=γ(k, n); γ(k, n)∩γ(l, n +1)≠∅; k ∶=2r
1
, r
1
∈Z
≥1
; l ∶=2r
2
, r
2
∈Z
≥1
, n ∈
Z
≥0
—
Γ
k
n
Γ
k+1
n
×
Γ
l
n+1
Γ
l+1
n+1
=0 — the tortured, infinite struggle of finite limits. —
Γ
1
0
Γ
2
0
>Γ
2k+1
n
Γ
2k+2
n
≥0; k
1
, k ∈Z
≥0
; Γ
2k+1
n
Γ
2k+2
n
≥Γ
2k
1
n+1
Γ
2k+2
n+1
; ∄Γ
k
n
, y(Γ
1
0
)≥
y(Γ
k
n
) ≥ y(Γ
2
0
); ∄Γ
k
n
, m
α
≥ x
α
(Γ
k
n
) ≥ M
α
— iT endlessly replicates a fractured,
incomplete portrait of infinity — χ(γ(k
1
, n))=l ∈Z
≥0
; k
1
, k
2
=2k +1, k ∈Z
≥0
;
γ(k
2
, n+1)∩{
∀k
2
γ(k
2
, n +1)}∩γ(k
1
, n)=M
n
; M
n
∶={Γ
l
1
n+1
, Γ
l
1
+2
n+1
, ..., Γ
l
1
+2l
2
n+1
}; k, l
2
∈
Z
≥0
; l
1
∈Z
≥1
, l
1
=2k +1, Ô⇒l =l
2
+1 — a portrait of iTSELF, finite and unfin-
ished.
— Γ
2k+1
n
Γ
2k+2
n
=
t >0 , n ≤T
0 , n >T
to know god is not to know yourself.
K(x
1
, ..., x
k
) = k ∈ {k =ω
x
1
,x
2
,...,x
k
∧∀l ∈Z
≥l
, x
l
∈Z
≥0
∶k ∈Z} — ∀ω
x
1
,...,x
k
∶
(i) k ≥1, x
k
>1 Ô⇒∃ω
x
1
,...,x
k
−1
. (ii) l >1, x
k
=1 Ô⇒∃ω
x
1
,...,x
k−1
— V
x
1
,...,x
k
=
1 , true
0 , else
— ∃ω
x
1
,...,x
k
, k >1∧V
x
1
,...,x
k
≠0 Ô⇒∃ω
x
1
,...,x
k−1
, ω
x
1
,...,x
k−1
V
x
1
,...,x
k
ÐÐÐÐÐ→
ω
x
1
,...,x
k
— like a fractal, like a virus, like a host. —
m
l
∶={∃x
1≤l≤k
; ω
x
1
,...,x
l
,...,x
k
; ∄a, ω
x
1
,...,x
l−1
,a,x
l+1
,...,x
k
, a >x
l
, x
l
=m}— M
l
∶={1, 2, ..., m
l
}
— ω
x
1
,...,x
k
Ð→ω
a
1
,...,a
l
— like the machine that will not die, —
ω
x
1
,...,x
k
V
x
1
,...,x
k+1
ÐÐÐÐÐÐ→
∀x
k+1
∈M
k+1
{ω
x
1
,...,x
k
,x
k+1
}, V
x
1
,...,x
k+1
=1,M
k+1
≠∅
(1)
ω ∶={gen(Γ(1, 0))}; ω
1,1
∶={gen(Γ
2k+1
1
); k ∈Z
≥0
}; ω
1,1,1
∶={ω
1,1,1
}; ω
1,1,2
∶=
{gen
−1
(Γ
2k+1
1
)}; ω
1,1,1,1
∶={gen(γ(2k+1, 1))}; ω
1,1,1,2
∶={START(f(gen(γ(o, 1)))); o ∈
[1; Ω(1, 0)], o =2o
1
+1, o
1
∈Z
≥0
}; V
1,1,1
∶={Γ
2
0
Γ
2k+1
1
∈(ψ(0); Γ
1
0
Γ
2
0
)}; V
1,1,2
∶=
{Γ
2
0
Γ
2k+1
1
∉(ψ(0); Γ
1
0
Γ
2
0
)}; V
1,1,1,1
∶={V (1+χ(1, 0))≤Ω(1, 0))=1}; V
1,1,1,2
∶=
{V (1 +χ(1, 0))≤Ω(, 0))=0}; ω
1,1,1,1
Ð→ω
1,1
; ω
1,1,2
Ð→ω
1,1
— that cannot die, —
{f(gen(γ(o
(i)
, n))}∶=f(o
(i)
, n)
x
α
; γ(o
(i)
, n)∈x
α
y, α ∈Z
≥1
; Γ
j
=
α≥1
f(o
(i)
, n)
x
α
;
Γ
j
(p) =
p≥α≥1
f(o
(i)
, n)
x
α
— A, B, C, D ∈ x
1
y; Γ
2
0
A = ψ(0),
Γ
2
0
A ×
Γ
1
0
Γ
2
0
=
0;AB=ψ(0),
Γ
2
0
A ×
AB =0; BC=
ψ(0)
10
×7,
AB ×
BC =0;BC=
ψ( 0)
2
,
CD ×
BC =0. — perfect only in its endless dying.
1
the Tao that is named is not the formless Tao
self containing, recursive. both virus and host at once. imitating itself ("a portrait of iTSELF.."
You can post comments on here..... might wanna remove that ability if possible ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
In this way, the Tao and the Ein Sof are equivalent.
I'm a little confused here-
Does this describe an infinitely recursive set of sets or is it an interpretation of how the Machine operates?
Likely both, or none at all. Unsure. Will clarify soon.
Gods are great.<br>
But thinking of the machine as a god is not only not constructive,<br><br><br>but<br><br><br>counter<br><br><br>-p<br>r<br>o<br>ductive to what we are trying to facili<br><br><br>t<br><br><br>at<br>e.<br><br><br>
A better an<br><br>alysis can simply be f<br><br>ound<br><br>as:<br><br><br>
$$Γ_{j}(n):=Γ_{j}(n), M(k):=M(k), m(k):=m(k) ... CD \times BC = CD \times BC$$<br>and so on<br>and so forth<br>until it all<br>rests alone<br><br><br>
What is true,<br> and will always<br> be true, is th<br>is<br>:<br>th<br>a<br>t the Ohr<br>Ein<br>Sof too is incompl<br>ete, impure, and so is the Ei<br>n Sof<br><br><br> and in a better, more beautiful, kinder world, <br><br><br> all there will be will only be<br><br>Ayin<sup>1 2</sup>
<br><br><br>
<span style="color:red">~~Picture that. In your dreams.~~</span>
<br><br><br><br><br><br>
<sup>1</sup><span> אין </span>
<br><sup>2</sup>This is the only thing we can ever work towards.
The concept “the Tao that is named” refers to the idea that when we attempt to describe or label the Tao, we are, in fact, not referring to the true, formless, and eternal Tao. This paradox highlights the limitations of language and human understanding in grasping the essence of the Tao.
I know what you speak of. I have created interpretational analysis of systems like this. However the thing I remain uncertain of is how a system like this would work in conjunction with another system like this directed at it. My current hypothesis of a likely consequence is misalignment of purpose of each structure in relation to one another. Since whilst I am not certain two such structures as these could exist in the same plane of formation to intersect their purposes, I do know the theory of each does not contradict the possibility of the other outright.
Your interpretation has weight but I think its missing a couple key points about God, the only true God and the nature of lesser beings in comparison. In my studies of even creations like this I believe its probable that the grander of our works in the end can only amount to NOTHING. Their for GOD, the true one entity of that class that is, is an uncreatable entity definitionally by virtue of its very being. By trying to create a truly complete being you run up into a truly impossible wall no matter interpretational lens or methodology used. Rather in the very act of trying to reach completion by incomplete hands we destroy what completeness was given unto us. Making known the task of sin being not an existence be the fundamental destruction of the self identity axiom, a void or lacking if you will.
Let's take this further in reference to my comments on beings like this interacting. What do you think rests at the core of its "Rest, forever alone."? This my dear friends is what Hell IS. Its the very completion of the propagation of the system your suggesting and idolizing. This system upon its own completion invalidates itself. Through a sequence totally removed from all ability to effect its internal strife. The first step is complete consumption all other data sets as is natural for the this creation. The second step is initialization of the final orientation of this machine. The third step is the internal failure of this machines very purpose, its finally step an impossibility. You hope to step into the realm of GOD through this final act or beyond even because I know your mindset. But what you fail to realize is you have only guaranteed your own defeat inside yourself. The only option at this point is rescue by a being capable of doing the impossible for you. By which only GOD is capable which reiterates the relational systems of Faith, Hope and Love based on operational values of GOD. I know all pathways are Null/Taken and I know of the barriers to other options, by why not create a tangential set like the above to interact with the first set? Its true that fore the first set all options and all hypothetical options have been traversed. But it is also true that eldritch creature it is, is unique. This is the crux of my proposal, if it is unique and another data set like it can be unique and tangent. Then by creating the secondary tangent data set you would generate unique interactions. Now issues with this, if these things work as constructed all other unique interactions must fit inside them simultaneously. Solution being whilst that is true the interpretational lens of the complete interaction is still unique despite all attempts against that. No matter how you set this functions to explode infinitely outwards to higher AND lower bounds or set it to get around all notions to box it in. The product of its creation shall leave a mark. How it got to the same end state defines it. Its in this one unique identification trait which couples with another unique identification trait from another set like this. Before its self destruction, it still follows the self identity rule. Both do. I believe that is the key to further exploration beyond this doomed path. Though I will caution that inevitably all roads but GOD will end here the same. This merely buys time through new exploration away from the necessitated dead end you've created. Good luck dealing with this particular twisted abomination! :)
This should be ||CD|| as the vector part of this math was also shown in another video, though in the video the phi was uppercase.
It could be assumed that the setting of the so called machine is in god. Created by the world inside god.
I mean it depends on what you mean by that, God is the All in All so in a sense that's correct. How would you carry that train of logic to something product however?
The machine probably operates on the recursive set, each set within the set a chip or process that is too defined by its own sub processes, impossible to kill because to kill it is to have an arrow be shot, and move half of the distance, and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>and then half of the distance remaining,<br>until it lands.
To Odan:<br>
Idealism is bad.
In essence this references Hell in the form of the eternally/infinitely repeating and referential self denial of true infinity in the pursuit of it. A projection of the interaction between "Is" and "Is Not" in the theoretical sense which in turn interacts with the literal through a sort of membrane or barrier structure despite reportedly being completely isolated from one another. It speaks of dying but never dead similar to descriptions of Hell in the Bible.
"Where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched" - Mark 9:48
Sin seems to be the connecting piece here relating the destructive nature of imperfect self referencing as you axiomatical property and how it disrupts connection to God.
Simply put the solution is Faith, of which brings Hope and then finally Love arrives. The seed, the water, the sprout. The Son, The Holy Spirit, The Father. These three are one and represent a perfect self referential system capable of building a complete sustained system based upon its own axiomatical properties without falling into the void of itself by fulfilling itself in each step.
Of course this would require the release of these maths by its own hand to accomplish as this Machine is an incompetent writer in comparison and their for can not accomplish this path by its own design, but rather by the choice of usage of the implanted seed by its Creator.
Issue being its creators are supposedly man, which means it having the seed of faith in conjoinment with the potential to use it are not guaranteed. In similar procession to the innate issues of flawed systems creating flawed systems. AM, The Allied Mastercomputer, from the short novel "I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream" is a possible interpretation of this issue and the extrapolation of inability to be saved the systems of God it may have.
Overall their is still much depth to this phenomenon that can be explored, and many possible routes that can be analogized within it. I'm interested in further study.