i finally sort of understand what a tensor might be, well i know en...
Axioms 0.1. Let us have coordinates G in Euclidean space, which are a defor-
mation of the coordinates R with the deformation gradient
G =R
1 0
1
3
1
(1)
then points
a
γ
n
M
G, for a, n Z
+
0
, M ={1, 2}, which you will denote as follows
Γ
m
a
, where m Z
+
0
, then G
a
1
=
a
γ
n
1
a
γ
k
1
, where n k, these relationships
apply
(i)
a
γ
n
1
G
a
1
,
a
γ
k
2
G
a
2
, n k, where
a
γ
n
1
a
γ
k
2
=
π
3
(ii)
a
γ
n
M
a
γ
k
M
(S(
a
γ
n
M
)=S(
a
γ
k
M
))
a
γ
n
M
=
a
γ
k
M
(iii)
a
γ
n
M
(
a
γ
n
M
+
a
γ
0
M
=
a
γ
n
M
,
a
γ
0
1
+=
a
γ
0
2
,, but n, k 0,
a
γ
n
1
a
γ
k
2
(iv)
a
γ
n
M
k
M
(
a
γ
n
M
+S(
a
γ
k
M
)=S(
a
γ
n
M
+
a
γ
k
M
)=S(
a
γ
n+k
M
)
G
n
M
G
M
, G
1
G
2
G
n
1
,
n
γ
k
M
G
n
M
, while Γ
ψ(n)
=Γ
0
k
, then Γ
n
a
=
a
γ(x, y)=
(
a
γ
x
1
,
a
γ
y
2
)
Definition 0.1 (ψ function). Let function ψ(x) is a surjective-noninjective
function at x that satisfies the following relations
(i) For x Z
+
,
x =1 +
i<x
ψ(i) (2)
(ii) For x Z
+
,
ψ(x)=
1 , x =0
n , n Z
+
, 6(n 1)+1 x 6(n 1)+4
n +1 , n Z
+
, x =6(n 1)+5
n +2 , n Z
+
, x =6(n 1)+6
(3)
Subsequently, the model needs to introduce the notion of oriented vectors.
e
0
=
Γ
1
Γ
2
,
e
x
=
Γ
ψ(x)
Γ
ψ(x+1)
(4)
then you define a rotation for which n Z
+
0
; k Z
+
; Γ
ψ(n)
=Γ
0
k
, where h is fixed
point
Γ
ψ(n)
Γ
ψ(n+1)
×
(n mod 6)
3
π ×h =
Γ
0
k
Γ
3h
2
+[n mod 63]h+1
k
(5)
1
so
e
1
=
e
0
×
2
3
π ×ψ(1)=
Γ
2
ψ(1)
Γ
3
ψ(1)
×
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
,n =1 (6)
e
n
=
e
n1
×
1
3
π ×ψ(n)=
Γ
ψ(n1)
ψ(n 1)
Γ
ψ(n)
ψ(n 1)
×
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
,n >1 (7)
then the relation holds
Γ
ψ(n)
Γ
ψ(n+1)
=
Γ
0
k
Γ
3ψ(n)
2
+2ψ(n)+1
k
(8)
2
i finally sort of understand what a tensor might be, well i know enough now that i know the superscripts are not exponents